Annex proceedings and the continued interplay with the Brussels Ia Regulation

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article deals with the interrelation between recast Brussels I Regulation and European Insolvency Regulation in respect of proceedings featuring connection with insolvency. It is essential to accommodate these proceedings within the scope of one or another regulation since it determines applicable jurisdictional rules and different possibilities for refusing the recognition and enforcement of a judgment. The article examines which type of actions could qualify as "deriving directly from the insolvency proceedings and which are closely linked to them" (annex proceedings) and therefore fall within European Insolvency Regulation. The possibility to invoke this regulation against third state defendants and exclusivity of jurisdiction in annex proceedings are also discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)197-217
    JournalERA Forum
    Volume16
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    insolvency
    regulation
    jurisdiction

    Keywords

    • Insolvency proceedings
    • Annex proceedings
    • Brussels Ia Regulation

    Cite this

    Annex proceedings and the continued interplay with the Brussels Ia Regulation. / Norkus, Rimvydas.

    In: ERA Forum, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2015, p. 197-217.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{afb00d9b28514cb8b78361aceb9981ce,
    title = "Annex proceedings and the continued interplay with the Brussels Ia Regulation",
    abstract = "This article deals with the interrelation between recast Brussels I Regulation and European Insolvency Regulation in respect of proceedings featuring connection with insolvency. It is essential to accommodate these proceedings within the scope of one or another regulation since it determines applicable jurisdictional rules and different possibilities for refusing the recognition and enforcement of a judgment. The article examines which type of actions could qualify as {"}deriving directly from the insolvency proceedings and which are closely linked to them{"} (annex proceedings) and therefore fall within European Insolvency Regulation. The possibility to invoke this regulation against third state defendants and exclusivity of jurisdiction in annex proceedings are also discussed.",
    keywords = "Insolvency proceedings, Annex proceedings, Brussels Ia Regulation",
    author = "Rimvydas Norkus",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1007/s12027-015-0396-x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "197--217",
    journal = "ERA Forum",
    issn = "1612-3093",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Annex proceedings and the continued interplay with the Brussels Ia Regulation

    AU - Norkus, Rimvydas

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - This article deals with the interrelation between recast Brussels I Regulation and European Insolvency Regulation in respect of proceedings featuring connection with insolvency. It is essential to accommodate these proceedings within the scope of one or another regulation since it determines applicable jurisdictional rules and different possibilities for refusing the recognition and enforcement of a judgment. The article examines which type of actions could qualify as "deriving directly from the insolvency proceedings and which are closely linked to them" (annex proceedings) and therefore fall within European Insolvency Regulation. The possibility to invoke this regulation against third state defendants and exclusivity of jurisdiction in annex proceedings are also discussed.

    AB - This article deals with the interrelation between recast Brussels I Regulation and European Insolvency Regulation in respect of proceedings featuring connection with insolvency. It is essential to accommodate these proceedings within the scope of one or another regulation since it determines applicable jurisdictional rules and different possibilities for refusing the recognition and enforcement of a judgment. The article examines which type of actions could qualify as "deriving directly from the insolvency proceedings and which are closely linked to them" (annex proceedings) and therefore fall within European Insolvency Regulation. The possibility to invoke this regulation against third state defendants and exclusivity of jurisdiction in annex proceedings are also discussed.

    KW - Insolvency proceedings

    KW - Annex proceedings

    KW - Brussels Ia Regulation

    U2 - 10.1007/s12027-015-0396-x

    DO - 10.1007/s12027-015-0396-x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 197

    EP - 217

    JO - ERA Forum

    JF - ERA Forum

    SN - 1612-3093

    IS - 2

    ER -