(Anti)hermeneutical philosophy for science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Philosophical hermeneutics claims that human understanding, while being contingent and historical, is likewise universal and bears within itself some pervasive features detectable via hermeneutical analyses of historically imparted tradition and language. Similarly, hermeneutical philosophy of science is condent that hermeneutical methods are the only proper tool to adequately assess, reconstruct, explain or give ameaning to historical but universal scientic knowledge and its various forms. I point out two versions of hermeneutical philosophy of science and argue that whenever philosophical hermeneutics pursues rescuing “scienticity”, human rationality, human rights, common values, and so forth under the pretence of its universality and competence, it necessarily transcends and violates the tenets of its own. I conclude in the favour ofmoderate interpretation of practical hermeneutics, perhaps in the very essence of it rest postmodern concepts of historicality, transparency and tolerance, withoutwhich there is no possibility of extricating oneself from hermeneuticism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-107
JournalStudia philosophica Estonica
Volume5.2
Issue numberspec. iss.
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Philosophy
Philosophical Hermeneutics
Philosophy of Science
Essence
Pretense
Tolerance
Hermeneutics
Rationality
Universality
Language
Tenets
Contingent
Transparency
Human Rights

Keywords

  • Hermeneutical philosophy of science
  • Neopragmatism
  • Philosophy of scientific practices

Cite this

(Anti)hermeneutical philosophy for science. / Juozelis, Evaldas.

In: Studia philosophica Estonica, Vol. 5.2, No. spec. iss., 2013, p. 95-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9f9bc8b97ec247b7b1a46cc71863e9a1,
title = "(Anti)hermeneutical philosophy for science",
abstract = "Philosophical hermeneutics claims that human understanding, while being contingent and historical, is likewise universal and bears within itself some pervasive features detectable via hermeneutical analyses of historically imparted tradition and language. Similarly, hermeneutical philosophy of science is condent that hermeneutical methods are the only proper tool to adequately assess, reconstruct, explain or give ameaning to historical but universal scientic knowledge and its various forms. I point out two versions of hermeneutical philosophy of science and argue that whenever philosophical hermeneutics pursues rescuing “scienticity”, human rationality, human rights, common values, and so forth under the pretence of its universality and competence, it necessarily transcends and violates the tenets of its own. I conclude in the favour ofmoderate interpretation of practical hermeneutics, perhaps in the very essence of it rest postmodern concepts of historicality, transparency and tolerance, withoutwhich there is no possibility of extricating oneself from hermeneuticism.",
keywords = "Hermeneutical philosophy of science, Neopragmatism, Philosophy of scientific practices",
author = "Evaldas Juozelis",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "5.2",
pages = "95--107",
journal = "Studia philosophica Estonica",
issn = "1736-5899",
number = "spec. iss.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Anti)hermeneutical philosophy for science

AU - Juozelis, Evaldas

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Philosophical hermeneutics claims that human understanding, while being contingent and historical, is likewise universal and bears within itself some pervasive features detectable via hermeneutical analyses of historically imparted tradition and language. Similarly, hermeneutical philosophy of science is condent that hermeneutical methods are the only proper tool to adequately assess, reconstruct, explain or give ameaning to historical but universal scientic knowledge and its various forms. I point out two versions of hermeneutical philosophy of science and argue that whenever philosophical hermeneutics pursues rescuing “scienticity”, human rationality, human rights, common values, and so forth under the pretence of its universality and competence, it necessarily transcends and violates the tenets of its own. I conclude in the favour ofmoderate interpretation of practical hermeneutics, perhaps in the very essence of it rest postmodern concepts of historicality, transparency and tolerance, withoutwhich there is no possibility of extricating oneself from hermeneuticism.

AB - Philosophical hermeneutics claims that human understanding, while being contingent and historical, is likewise universal and bears within itself some pervasive features detectable via hermeneutical analyses of historically imparted tradition and language. Similarly, hermeneutical philosophy of science is condent that hermeneutical methods are the only proper tool to adequately assess, reconstruct, explain or give ameaning to historical but universal scientic knowledge and its various forms. I point out two versions of hermeneutical philosophy of science and argue that whenever philosophical hermeneutics pursues rescuing “scienticity”, human rationality, human rights, common values, and so forth under the pretence of its universality and competence, it necessarily transcends and violates the tenets of its own. I conclude in the favour ofmoderate interpretation of practical hermeneutics, perhaps in the very essence of it rest postmodern concepts of historicality, transparency and tolerance, withoutwhich there is no possibility of extricating oneself from hermeneuticism.

KW - Hermeneutical philosophy of science

KW - Neopragmatism

KW - Philosophy of scientific practices

M3 - Article

VL - 5.2

SP - 95

EP - 107

JO - Studia philosophica Estonica

JF - Studia philosophica Estonica

SN - 1736-5899

IS - spec. iss.

ER -