Comparative assessment of future motor vehicles under various climate change mitigation scenarios

Dalia Štreimikienė, Jurate Sliogeriene

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of comparative assessment of future road transport technologies is to find the cheapest motor vehicles in terms of private and external Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission costs under various international climate change mitigation scenarios in 2020 and 2050. The comparative assessment of the main road transport technologies ranging from conventional vehicles to hybrid electric vehicles was performed. The main indicators for comparative future motor vehicles assessment are: private costs and life cycle external costs of GHG emissions. The obtained ranking of road transport technologies allows to identify the most perspective future motor vehicles taking into account international climate change mitigation constraints and to promote these road technologies by policy tools. The cheapest road transport technologies in 2020 and 2050 are: the main results presented in this paper were obtained during EU financed Framework 7 project "PLANETS" dealing with probabilistic long-term assessment of new energy technology scenarios.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3833-3838
Number of pages6
JournalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume15
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Climate change
Gas emissions
Greenhouse gases
Costs
Hybrid vehicles
Life cycle

Keywords

  • Carbon price
  • Life cycle GHG emissions
  • Motor vehicles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

Comparative assessment of future motor vehicles under various climate change mitigation scenarios. / Štreimikienė, Dalia; Sliogeriene, Jurate.

In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 15, No. 8, 10.2011, p. 3833-3838.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9b8250cff63f42bf9e297220a3f02ac8,
title = "Comparative assessment of future motor vehicles under various climate change mitigation scenarios",
abstract = "The aim of comparative assessment of future road transport technologies is to find the cheapest motor vehicles in terms of private and external Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission costs under various international climate change mitigation scenarios in 2020 and 2050. The comparative assessment of the main road transport technologies ranging from conventional vehicles to hybrid electric vehicles was performed. The main indicators for comparative future motor vehicles assessment are: private costs and life cycle external costs of GHG emissions. The obtained ranking of road transport technologies allows to identify the most perspective future motor vehicles taking into account international climate change mitigation constraints and to promote these road technologies by policy tools. The cheapest road transport technologies in 2020 and 2050 are: the main results presented in this paper were obtained during EU financed Framework 7 project {"}PLANETS{"} dealing with probabilistic long-term assessment of new energy technology scenarios.",
keywords = "Carbon price, Life cycle GHG emissions, Motor vehicles",
author = "Dalia Štreimikienė and Jurate Sliogeriene",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.020",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "3833--3838",
journal = "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews",
issn = "1364-0321",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative assessment of future motor vehicles under various climate change mitigation scenarios

AU - Štreimikienė, Dalia

AU - Sliogeriene, Jurate

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - The aim of comparative assessment of future road transport technologies is to find the cheapest motor vehicles in terms of private and external Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission costs under various international climate change mitigation scenarios in 2020 and 2050. The comparative assessment of the main road transport technologies ranging from conventional vehicles to hybrid electric vehicles was performed. The main indicators for comparative future motor vehicles assessment are: private costs and life cycle external costs of GHG emissions. The obtained ranking of road transport technologies allows to identify the most perspective future motor vehicles taking into account international climate change mitigation constraints and to promote these road technologies by policy tools. The cheapest road transport technologies in 2020 and 2050 are: the main results presented in this paper were obtained during EU financed Framework 7 project "PLANETS" dealing with probabilistic long-term assessment of new energy technology scenarios.

AB - The aim of comparative assessment of future road transport technologies is to find the cheapest motor vehicles in terms of private and external Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission costs under various international climate change mitigation scenarios in 2020 and 2050. The comparative assessment of the main road transport technologies ranging from conventional vehicles to hybrid electric vehicles was performed. The main indicators for comparative future motor vehicles assessment are: private costs and life cycle external costs of GHG emissions. The obtained ranking of road transport technologies allows to identify the most perspective future motor vehicles taking into account international climate change mitigation constraints and to promote these road technologies by policy tools. The cheapest road transport technologies in 2020 and 2050 are: the main results presented in this paper were obtained during EU financed Framework 7 project "PLANETS" dealing with probabilistic long-term assessment of new energy technology scenarios.

KW - Carbon price

KW - Life cycle GHG emissions

KW - Motor vehicles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960988945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960988945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.020

DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.020

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 3833

EP - 3838

JO - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

JF - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

SN - 1364-0321

IS - 8

ER -