Comparative assessment of road transport technologies

Dalia Streimikiene, Tomas Baležentis, Ligita Baležentiene

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to assess energy technologies in road transport sector in terms of atmospheric emissions and costs and to indicate the most competitive and environmentally friendly transport technologies. The main tasks of the paper are: to develop the multi-criteria framework for comparative assessment of energy technologies in road transport and to apply MCDM methods for the transport technologies assessment. One of the MCDM methods, viz. the interval TOPSIS method, is employed in order to tackle the uncertain criteria. The assessment framework allows comparing road transport technologies in terms of their environmental and economic impacts and facilitates decision making process in transport sector. The main indicators selected for technologies assessment are: private costs and life cycle emissions of the main pollutants (GHG; particulates, NOx, CO, HCs). The ranking of road transport technologies based on private costs and atmospheric emissions allowed prioritizing these technologies in terms of environmental friendliness the lowest costs. However the extent, capacity, and quality of road infrastructure affects the overall level of transportation activity, which in turn affects how much energy is consumed by vehicles and the amount of greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted. The paper presents the impact of transportation infrastructure on GHG emissions from road vehicles and policy implications of performed assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)611-618
Number of pages8
JournalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Greenhouse gases
Costs
Gas emissions
Life cycle
Decision making
Economics

Keywords

  • Atmospheric emissions
  • Energy
  • Fuel
  • GHG
  • MCDM
  • Road transport
  • Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

Comparative assessment of road transport technologies. / Streimikiene, Dalia; Baležentis, Tomas; Baležentiene, Ligita.

In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 20, 2013, p. 611-618.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Streimikiene, Dalia ; Baležentis, Tomas ; Baležentiene, Ligita. / Comparative assessment of road transport technologies. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013 ; Vol. 20. pp. 611-618.
@article{4f6ccb924a41424e9537dd2f8dbee779,
title = "Comparative assessment of road transport technologies",
abstract = "The aim of the paper is to assess energy technologies in road transport sector in terms of atmospheric emissions and costs and to indicate the most competitive and environmentally friendly transport technologies. The main tasks of the paper are: to develop the multi-criteria framework for comparative assessment of energy technologies in road transport and to apply MCDM methods for the transport technologies assessment. One of the MCDM methods, viz. the interval TOPSIS method, is employed in order to tackle the uncertain criteria. The assessment framework allows comparing road transport technologies in terms of their environmental and economic impacts and facilitates decision making process in transport sector. The main indicators selected for technologies assessment are: private costs and life cycle emissions of the main pollutants (GHG; particulates, NOx, CO, HCs). The ranking of road transport technologies based on private costs and atmospheric emissions allowed prioritizing these technologies in terms of environmental friendliness the lowest costs. However the extent, capacity, and quality of road infrastructure affects the overall level of transportation activity, which in turn affects how much energy is consumed by vehicles and the amount of greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted. The paper presents the impact of transportation infrastructure on GHG emissions from road vehicles and policy implications of performed assessment.",
keywords = "Atmospheric emissions, Energy, Fuel, GHG, MCDM, Road transport, Uncertainty",
author = "Dalia Streimikiene and Tomas Baležentis and Ligita Baležentiene",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.021",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "611--618",
journal = "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews",
issn = "1364-0321",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative assessment of road transport technologies

AU - Streimikiene, Dalia

AU - Baležentis, Tomas

AU - Baležentiene, Ligita

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The aim of the paper is to assess energy technologies in road transport sector in terms of atmospheric emissions and costs and to indicate the most competitive and environmentally friendly transport technologies. The main tasks of the paper are: to develop the multi-criteria framework for comparative assessment of energy technologies in road transport and to apply MCDM methods for the transport technologies assessment. One of the MCDM methods, viz. the interval TOPSIS method, is employed in order to tackle the uncertain criteria. The assessment framework allows comparing road transport technologies in terms of their environmental and economic impacts and facilitates decision making process in transport sector. The main indicators selected for technologies assessment are: private costs and life cycle emissions of the main pollutants (GHG; particulates, NOx, CO, HCs). The ranking of road transport technologies based on private costs and atmospheric emissions allowed prioritizing these technologies in terms of environmental friendliness the lowest costs. However the extent, capacity, and quality of road infrastructure affects the overall level of transportation activity, which in turn affects how much energy is consumed by vehicles and the amount of greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted. The paper presents the impact of transportation infrastructure on GHG emissions from road vehicles and policy implications of performed assessment.

AB - The aim of the paper is to assess energy technologies in road transport sector in terms of atmospheric emissions and costs and to indicate the most competitive and environmentally friendly transport technologies. The main tasks of the paper are: to develop the multi-criteria framework for comparative assessment of energy technologies in road transport and to apply MCDM methods for the transport technologies assessment. One of the MCDM methods, viz. the interval TOPSIS method, is employed in order to tackle the uncertain criteria. The assessment framework allows comparing road transport technologies in terms of their environmental and economic impacts and facilitates decision making process in transport sector. The main indicators selected for technologies assessment are: private costs and life cycle emissions of the main pollutants (GHG; particulates, NOx, CO, HCs). The ranking of road transport technologies based on private costs and atmospheric emissions allowed prioritizing these technologies in terms of environmental friendliness the lowest costs. However the extent, capacity, and quality of road infrastructure affects the overall level of transportation activity, which in turn affects how much energy is consumed by vehicles and the amount of greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted. The paper presents the impact of transportation infrastructure on GHG emissions from road vehicles and policy implications of performed assessment.

KW - Atmospheric emissions

KW - Energy

KW - Fuel

KW - GHG

KW - MCDM

KW - Road transport

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873830253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873830253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.021

DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.021

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 611

EP - 618

JO - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

JF - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

SN - 1364-0321

ER -