Comparative evaluation of national intellectual capital measurement models

Irena Mačerinskienė, Rasa Aleknavičiūtė

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

National intellectual capital is regarded as an important factor of a country’s ability to perform high value added functions including the ability to create innovations. Measuring national intellectual capital is still a complicated task. In this article national intellectual capital concept and measurement models are analysed in order to show how national intellectual capital could be measured. The findings show that there are several weaknesses of measurement models validity. Those weaknesses in more recent measurement models are minimized by introducing advanced national intellectual capital structural models and more complex value approximation methods. Analysis of selected national intellectual capital measurement models has shown that there are not many similar indicators used (from 21% to 60% of matching indicators), though results obtained by using these evaluation models have high significant correlation.

Translated title of the contributionComparative evaluation of national intellectual capital measurement models
Original languageLithuanian
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalBusiness: Theory and Practice
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 30 2015

Fingerprint

Intellectual capital
Measurement model
Evaluation
Innovation
Approximation
Evaluation model
Structural model
Value added
Factors

Keywords

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Strategy and Management
    • Civil and Structural Engineering

    Cite this

    Valstybės intelektinio kapitalo vertinimo modelių lyginamoji analizė. / Mačerinskienė, Irena; Aleknavičiūtė, Rasa.

    In: Business: Theory and Practice, Vol. 16, No. 1, 30.03.2015, p. 1-14.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{d4d57689757f45d5b12a0439a439e406,
    title = "Valstybės intelektinio kapitalo vertinimo modelių lyginamoji analizė",
    abstract = "National intellectual capital is regarded as an important factor of a country’s ability to perform high value added functions including the ability to create innovations. Measuring national intellectual capital is still a complicated task. In this article national intellectual capital concept and measurement models are analysed in order to show how national intellectual capital could be measured. The findings show that there are several weaknesses of measurement models validity. Those weaknesses in more recent measurement models are minimized by introducing advanced national intellectual capital structural models and more complex value approximation methods. Analysis of selected national intellectual capital measurement models has shown that there are not many similar indicators used (from 21{\%} to 60{\%} of matching indicators), though results obtained by using these evaluation models have high significant correlation.",
    keywords = "Human capital, Intangibles, Knowledge capital, National intellectual capital, National intellectual capital measurement models, Structural capital",
    author = "Irena Mačerinskienė and Rasa Aleknavičiūtė",
    year = "2015",
    month = "3",
    day = "30",
    doi = "10.3846/btp.2015.548",
    language = "Lithuanian",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "1--14",
    journal = "Business: Theory and Practice",
    issn = "1648-0627",
    publisher = "Technika",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Valstybės intelektinio kapitalo vertinimo modelių lyginamoji analizė

    AU - Mačerinskienė, Irena

    AU - Aleknavičiūtė, Rasa

    PY - 2015/3/30

    Y1 - 2015/3/30

    N2 - National intellectual capital is regarded as an important factor of a country’s ability to perform high value added functions including the ability to create innovations. Measuring national intellectual capital is still a complicated task. In this article national intellectual capital concept and measurement models are analysed in order to show how national intellectual capital could be measured. The findings show that there are several weaknesses of measurement models validity. Those weaknesses in more recent measurement models are minimized by introducing advanced national intellectual capital structural models and more complex value approximation methods. Analysis of selected national intellectual capital measurement models has shown that there are not many similar indicators used (from 21% to 60% of matching indicators), though results obtained by using these evaluation models have high significant correlation.

    AB - National intellectual capital is regarded as an important factor of a country’s ability to perform high value added functions including the ability to create innovations. Measuring national intellectual capital is still a complicated task. In this article national intellectual capital concept and measurement models are analysed in order to show how national intellectual capital could be measured. The findings show that there are several weaknesses of measurement models validity. Those weaknesses in more recent measurement models are minimized by introducing advanced national intellectual capital structural models and more complex value approximation methods. Analysis of selected national intellectual capital measurement models has shown that there are not many similar indicators used (from 21% to 60% of matching indicators), though results obtained by using these evaluation models have high significant correlation.

    KW - Human capital

    KW - Intangibles

    KW - Knowledge capital

    KW - National intellectual capital

    KW - National intellectual capital measurement models

    KW - Structural capital

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928347033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928347033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.3846/btp.2015.548

    DO - 10.3846/btp.2015.548

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 1

    EP - 14

    JO - Business: Theory and Practice

    JF - Business: Theory and Practice

    SN - 1648-0627

    IS - 1

    ER -