Differentiating public policy for technology startups - Essential for biotech?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The paper presents the limited quantitative and qualitative analysis of the biotechnology and ICT industries in Lithuania and Estonia, as well as public policy instruments aimed at supporting the development of these industries. In depth analysis of the employment and revenue profile and correlations of the selected biotechnology and ICT enterprises are provided. The paper suggests that existing public policy instruments designed to promote enterprise and innovation fail to differentiate among technological fields. This and other factors cause preference to the short cycle technological fields, such as ICT. Very few instruments are available for the needs of the biotechnology industry, and the long cycles and return horizons of biotechnology development are not recognized. These oversights are detrimental to the biotechnology sector and high-tech local employment. Suggestions on the policy reform are made.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)39-52
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Commercial Biotechnology
    Volume21
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2015

    Fingerprint

    Public Policy
    Biotechnology
    Technology
    Industry
    Estonia
    Lithuania
    Innovation
    Start-ups
    Biotech
    Public policy
    Biotechnology industry
    Policy instruments

    Keywords

    • Biotechnology
    • Business cycle
    • Entrepreneurship
    • ICT
    • Startups
    • Technology

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Biotechnology
    • Management of Technology and Innovation
    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    @article{e24087575f8f4729a9b544eadfd02c27,
    title = "Differentiating public policy for technology startups - Essential for biotech?",
    abstract = "The paper presents the limited quantitative and qualitative analysis of the biotechnology and ICT industries in Lithuania and Estonia, as well as public policy instruments aimed at supporting the development of these industries. In depth analysis of the employment and revenue profile and correlations of the selected biotechnology and ICT enterprises are provided. The paper suggests that existing public policy instruments designed to promote enterprise and innovation fail to differentiate among technological fields. This and other factors cause preference to the short cycle technological fields, such as ICT. Very few instruments are available for the needs of the biotechnology industry, and the long cycles and return horizons of biotechnology development are not recognized. These oversights are detrimental to the biotechnology sector and high-tech local employment. Suggestions on the policy reform are made.",
    keywords = "Biotechnology, Business cycle, Entrepreneurship, ICT, Startups, Technology",
    author = "Mindaugas Kiškis and Tadas Limba and Gintare Gulevičiute",
    year = "2015",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.5912/jcb672",
    language = "English",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "39--52",
    journal = "Journal of Commercial Biotechnology",
    issn = "1462-8732",
    publisher = "ThinkBiotech",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Differentiating public policy for technology startups - Essential for biotech?

    AU - Kiškis, Mindaugas

    AU - Limba, Tadas

    AU - Gulevičiute, Gintare

    PY - 2015/1/1

    Y1 - 2015/1/1

    N2 - The paper presents the limited quantitative and qualitative analysis of the biotechnology and ICT industries in Lithuania and Estonia, as well as public policy instruments aimed at supporting the development of these industries. In depth analysis of the employment and revenue profile and correlations of the selected biotechnology and ICT enterprises are provided. The paper suggests that existing public policy instruments designed to promote enterprise and innovation fail to differentiate among technological fields. This and other factors cause preference to the short cycle technological fields, such as ICT. Very few instruments are available for the needs of the biotechnology industry, and the long cycles and return horizons of biotechnology development are not recognized. These oversights are detrimental to the biotechnology sector and high-tech local employment. Suggestions on the policy reform are made.

    AB - The paper presents the limited quantitative and qualitative analysis of the biotechnology and ICT industries in Lithuania and Estonia, as well as public policy instruments aimed at supporting the development of these industries. In depth analysis of the employment and revenue profile and correlations of the selected biotechnology and ICT enterprises are provided. The paper suggests that existing public policy instruments designed to promote enterprise and innovation fail to differentiate among technological fields. This and other factors cause preference to the short cycle technological fields, such as ICT. Very few instruments are available for the needs of the biotechnology industry, and the long cycles and return horizons of biotechnology development are not recognized. These oversights are detrimental to the biotechnology sector and high-tech local employment. Suggestions on the policy reform are made.

    KW - Biotechnology

    KW - Business cycle

    KW - Entrepreneurship

    KW - ICT

    KW - Startups

    KW - Technology

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920401268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920401268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.5912/jcb672

    DO - 10.5912/jcb672

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84920401268

    VL - 21

    SP - 39

    EP - 52

    JO - Journal of Commercial Biotechnology

    JF - Journal of Commercial Biotechnology

    SN - 1462-8732

    IS - 1

    ER -