Embedding Academic Integrity in Public Universities

Loreta Tauginienė

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Particular concern about academic ethics in higher education and research institutions (HERIs) in Lithuania was addressed in 2009 by the national decision to establish an Office of Ombudsman for Academic Ethics and Procedures (Office). The decision was taken during the approval of the revised Law on Higher Education and Research by the Parliament of Lithuania. Following two failed attempts to appoint an ombudsman, the Office began to function in 2014. Since then, the ombudsman, alongside other state institutions, has been empowered to implement national higher education and research policy. At the outset of the Office activity it is important to consider how public HERIs institutionalise academic integrity, i.e. how they create an ethical environment within the academic community and what means are used to support it further. Collecting data from codes of ethics, regulations of academic integrity committees and interviews, data analysis shows that academic values manifest unevenly in teaching/learning and research. Most efforts concern the behaviour of students rather than the behaviour of academic staff (teachers and researchers). Moreover, ethics infrastructure gives a misleading image, as it lacks harmony and compatibility, despite the fact that there is a myriad of means to foster ethical behaviour. Universities should make greater effort to connect academic values with operations in teaching/learning and research.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberDOI: 10.1007/s10805-016-9268-4
Pages (from-to)327-344
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Academic Ethics
Volume14
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Oct 31 2016

Fingerprint

integrity
public advocate
moral philosophy
Lithuania
education
research policy
Teaching
parliament
learning
Values
data analysis
Public Universities
Academic Integrity
infrastructure
staff
regulation
Law
lack
teacher
interview

Keywords

  • academic ethics
  • academic integrity
  • public university
  • ethics infrastructure
  • institutionalisation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Tauginienė, L. (2016). Embedding Academic Integrity in Public Universities. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14(4), 327-344. [DOI: 10.1007/s10805-016-9268-4].

Embedding Academic Integrity in Public Universities. / Tauginienė, Loreta .

In: Journal of Academic Ethics, Vol. 14, No. 4, DOI: 10.1007/s10805-016-9268-4, 31.10.2016, p. 327-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tauginienė, L 2016, 'Embedding Academic Integrity in Public Universities', Journal of Academic Ethics, vol. 14, no. 4, DOI: 10.1007/s10805-016-9268-4, pp. 327-344.
Tauginienė L. Embedding Academic Integrity in Public Universities. Journal of Academic Ethics. 2016 Oct 31;14(4):327-344. DOI: 10.1007/s10805-016-9268-4.
Tauginienė, Loreta . / Embedding Academic Integrity in Public Universities. In: Journal of Academic Ethics. 2016 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 327-344.
@article{01c4bd02fcc148aba25e18e60d977e53,
title = "Embedding Academic Integrity in Public Universities",
abstract = "Particular concern about academic ethics in higher education and research institutions (HERIs) in Lithuania was addressed in 2009 by the national decision to establish an Office of Ombudsman for Academic Ethics and Procedures (Office). The decision was taken during the approval of the revised Law on Higher Education and Research by the Parliament of Lithuania. Following two failed attempts to appoint an ombudsman, the Office began to function in 2014. Since then, the ombudsman, alongside other state institutions, has been empowered to implement national higher education and research policy. At the outset of the Office activity it is important to consider how public HERIs institutionalise academic integrity, i.e. how they create an ethical environment within the academic community and what means are used to support it further. Collecting data from codes of ethics, regulations of academic integrity committees and interviews, data analysis shows that academic values manifest unevenly in teaching/learning and research. Most efforts concern the behaviour of students rather than the behaviour of academic staff (teachers and researchers). Moreover, ethics infrastructure gives a misleading image, as it lacks harmony and compatibility, despite the fact that there is a myriad of means to foster ethical behaviour. Universities should make greater effort to connect academic values with operations in teaching/learning and research.",
keywords = "academic ethics, academic integrity, public university, ethics infrastructure, institutionalisation",
author = "Loreta Tauginienė",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "31",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "327--344",
journal = "Journal of Academic Ethics",
issn = "1570-1727",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embedding Academic Integrity in Public Universities

AU - Tauginienė, Loreta

PY - 2016/10/31

Y1 - 2016/10/31

N2 - Particular concern about academic ethics in higher education and research institutions (HERIs) in Lithuania was addressed in 2009 by the national decision to establish an Office of Ombudsman for Academic Ethics and Procedures (Office). The decision was taken during the approval of the revised Law on Higher Education and Research by the Parliament of Lithuania. Following two failed attempts to appoint an ombudsman, the Office began to function in 2014. Since then, the ombudsman, alongside other state institutions, has been empowered to implement national higher education and research policy. At the outset of the Office activity it is important to consider how public HERIs institutionalise academic integrity, i.e. how they create an ethical environment within the academic community and what means are used to support it further. Collecting data from codes of ethics, regulations of academic integrity committees and interviews, data analysis shows that academic values manifest unevenly in teaching/learning and research. Most efforts concern the behaviour of students rather than the behaviour of academic staff (teachers and researchers). Moreover, ethics infrastructure gives a misleading image, as it lacks harmony and compatibility, despite the fact that there is a myriad of means to foster ethical behaviour. Universities should make greater effort to connect academic values with operations in teaching/learning and research.

AB - Particular concern about academic ethics in higher education and research institutions (HERIs) in Lithuania was addressed in 2009 by the national decision to establish an Office of Ombudsman for Academic Ethics and Procedures (Office). The decision was taken during the approval of the revised Law on Higher Education and Research by the Parliament of Lithuania. Following two failed attempts to appoint an ombudsman, the Office began to function in 2014. Since then, the ombudsman, alongside other state institutions, has been empowered to implement national higher education and research policy. At the outset of the Office activity it is important to consider how public HERIs institutionalise academic integrity, i.e. how they create an ethical environment within the academic community and what means are used to support it further. Collecting data from codes of ethics, regulations of academic integrity committees and interviews, data analysis shows that academic values manifest unevenly in teaching/learning and research. Most efforts concern the behaviour of students rather than the behaviour of academic staff (teachers and researchers). Moreover, ethics infrastructure gives a misleading image, as it lacks harmony and compatibility, despite the fact that there is a myriad of means to foster ethical behaviour. Universities should make greater effort to connect academic values with operations in teaching/learning and research.

KW - academic ethics

KW - academic integrity

KW - public university

KW - ethics infrastructure

KW - institutionalisation

UR - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-016-9268-4

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 327

EP - 344

JO - Journal of Academic Ethics

JF - Journal of Academic Ethics

SN - 1570-1727

IS - 4

M1 - DOI: 10.1007/s10805-016-9268-4

ER -