Empowering institutions

A case for connecting business and the academe through Phronesis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Arguably World War II had a fundamental and profound impact on the Western culture, practices and institutions. One central feature of this impact was the disillusionment with the capacity of social sciences to help policymakers improve society. The past 60 or so years have seen a major crisis of identity throughout the disciplines of social science. On one hand, positivism stood on the premise that the war was a result of irrational and pseudoscientific totalitarian social theories; on the other hand, post-modernist (and various other "postisms") raised doubts about the possibility of social science being something more than just another variation of totalitarian ideology. This polarization has seen animated polemic and methodological confrontation with seemingly no victors. As a result, social science as a whole lost its reputation as a credible source of knowledge for successful action. A strand of social science reformers in various disciplines are trying to build alternative definitions of what social science ought to constitute which would accommodate claims of both warring sides. However, persuasive as these integrative attempts may be, such ideas are having a hard time of becoming the mainstream of social science. By borrowing from institutionalist perspectives, this paper constructs an argument that the reason for the lack of relevance of social science in business and policy is not so much a methodological weakness of the science as it is the incompatibility of institutionalized interest between business and the academe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-185
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Security and Sustainability Issues
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Social sciences
social science
Industry
social theory
positivism
incompatibility
ideology
polarization
World War II
reputation
Polarization
lack
science

Keywords

  • Applied social research
  • Institutional inertia
  • Institutionalism
  • Phronetic social science
  • Positivism
  • Structure-agency problem

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety Research
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

@article{849679b6d4714773ac8a89975fdf8078,
title = "Empowering institutions: A case for connecting business and the academe through Phronesis",
abstract = "Arguably World War II had a fundamental and profound impact on the Western culture, practices and institutions. One central feature of this impact was the disillusionment with the capacity of social sciences to help policymakers improve society. The past 60 or so years have seen a major crisis of identity throughout the disciplines of social science. On one hand, positivism stood on the premise that the war was a result of irrational and pseudoscientific totalitarian social theories; on the other hand, post-modernist (and various other {"}postisms{"}) raised doubts about the possibility of social science being something more than just another variation of totalitarian ideology. This polarization has seen animated polemic and methodological confrontation with seemingly no victors. As a result, social science as a whole lost its reputation as a credible source of knowledge for successful action. A strand of social science reformers in various disciplines are trying to build alternative definitions of what social science ought to constitute which would accommodate claims of both warring sides. However, persuasive as these integrative attempts may be, such ideas are having a hard time of becoming the mainstream of social science. By borrowing from institutionalist perspectives, this paper constructs an argument that the reason for the lack of relevance of social science in business and policy is not so much a methodological weakness of the science as it is the incompatibility of institutionalized interest between business and the academe.",
keywords = "Applied social research, Institutional inertia, Institutionalism, Phronetic social science, Positivism, Structure-agency problem",
author = "Mantas Bileišis",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.9770/jssi/2012.1.3(3)",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "177--185",
journal = "Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues",
issn = "2029-7017",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empowering institutions

T2 - A case for connecting business and the academe through Phronesis

AU - Bileišis, Mantas

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Arguably World War II had a fundamental and profound impact on the Western culture, practices and institutions. One central feature of this impact was the disillusionment with the capacity of social sciences to help policymakers improve society. The past 60 or so years have seen a major crisis of identity throughout the disciplines of social science. On one hand, positivism stood on the premise that the war was a result of irrational and pseudoscientific totalitarian social theories; on the other hand, post-modernist (and various other "postisms") raised doubts about the possibility of social science being something more than just another variation of totalitarian ideology. This polarization has seen animated polemic and methodological confrontation with seemingly no victors. As a result, social science as a whole lost its reputation as a credible source of knowledge for successful action. A strand of social science reformers in various disciplines are trying to build alternative definitions of what social science ought to constitute which would accommodate claims of both warring sides. However, persuasive as these integrative attempts may be, such ideas are having a hard time of becoming the mainstream of social science. By borrowing from institutionalist perspectives, this paper constructs an argument that the reason for the lack of relevance of social science in business and policy is not so much a methodological weakness of the science as it is the incompatibility of institutionalized interest between business and the academe.

AB - Arguably World War II had a fundamental and profound impact on the Western culture, practices and institutions. One central feature of this impact was the disillusionment with the capacity of social sciences to help policymakers improve society. The past 60 or so years have seen a major crisis of identity throughout the disciplines of social science. On one hand, positivism stood on the premise that the war was a result of irrational and pseudoscientific totalitarian social theories; on the other hand, post-modernist (and various other "postisms") raised doubts about the possibility of social science being something more than just another variation of totalitarian ideology. This polarization has seen animated polemic and methodological confrontation with seemingly no victors. As a result, social science as a whole lost its reputation as a credible source of knowledge for successful action. A strand of social science reformers in various disciplines are trying to build alternative definitions of what social science ought to constitute which would accommodate claims of both warring sides. However, persuasive as these integrative attempts may be, such ideas are having a hard time of becoming the mainstream of social science. By borrowing from institutionalist perspectives, this paper constructs an argument that the reason for the lack of relevance of social science in business and policy is not so much a methodological weakness of the science as it is the incompatibility of institutionalized interest between business and the academe.

KW - Applied social research

KW - Institutional inertia

KW - Institutionalism

KW - Phronetic social science

KW - Positivism

KW - Structure-agency problem

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897421146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897421146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.9770/jssi/2012.1.3(3)

DO - 10.9770/jssi/2012.1.3(3)

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 177

EP - 185

JO - Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues

JF - Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues

SN - 2029-7017

IS - 3

ER -