Has the action for failure to act in the European Union lost its purpose?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyzes the purpose of the action for failure to act under article 265 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The statements are derived from the analysis of scientific literature, relevant legislation, practice of the European Union Court of Justice (CJEU) and the European Union General Court (EUGC). Useful information has also been obtained from the opinions of general advocates of the CJEU. The article of TFEU 265, which governs the action for failure to act, is very abstract. For this reason, a whole procedure under the article 265 TFEU was developed by the EU courts. The original purpose of the action for failure to act was to constitute whether European Union (EU) institution properly fulfilled its obligations under the EU legislation. However, in the course of case-law, a mere EU institution's express refusal to fulfill its duties became sufficient to constitute that the EU institution acted and therefore action for failure to act became devoid of purpose. This article analyzes whether the action for failure to act has lost its purpose and become an ineffective legal remedy in the system of judicial review in the EU. Additionally, the action for failure to act is compared to similar national actions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-226
Number of pages18
JournalBaltic Journal of Law and Politics
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

legislation
legal remedies
court of justice
technical literature
case law
treaty
obligation

Keywords

  • Action for failure to act
  • article 265 TFEU
  • European Union
  • judicial protection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Has the action for failure to act in the European Union lost its purpose? / Daukšiene, Inga; Budnikas, Arvydas.

In: Baltic Journal of Law and Politics, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.12.2014, p. 209-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{08fa487235694d398c2e15c7afa744ad,
title = "Has the action for failure to act in the European Union lost its purpose?",
abstract = "This article analyzes the purpose of the action for failure to act under article 265 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The statements are derived from the analysis of scientific literature, relevant legislation, practice of the European Union Court of Justice (CJEU) and the European Union General Court (EUGC). Useful information has also been obtained from the opinions of general advocates of the CJEU. The article of TFEU 265, which governs the action for failure to act, is very abstract. For this reason, a whole procedure under the article 265 TFEU was developed by the EU courts. The original purpose of the action for failure to act was to constitute whether European Union (EU) institution properly fulfilled its obligations under the EU legislation. However, in the course of case-law, a mere EU institution's express refusal to fulfill its duties became sufficient to constitute that the EU institution acted and therefore action for failure to act became devoid of purpose. This article analyzes whether the action for failure to act has lost its purpose and become an ineffective legal remedy in the system of judicial review in the EU. Additionally, the action for failure to act is compared to similar national actions.",
keywords = "Action for failure to act, article 265 TFEU, European Union, judicial protection",
author = "Inga Daukšiene and Arvydas Budnikas",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/bjlp-2015-0008",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "209--226",
journal = "Baltic Journal of Law and Politics",
issn = "2029-0454",
publisher = "Versita (Central European Science Publishers)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Has the action for failure to act in the European Union lost its purpose?

AU - Daukšiene, Inga

AU - Budnikas, Arvydas

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - This article analyzes the purpose of the action for failure to act under article 265 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The statements are derived from the analysis of scientific literature, relevant legislation, practice of the European Union Court of Justice (CJEU) and the European Union General Court (EUGC). Useful information has also been obtained from the opinions of general advocates of the CJEU. The article of TFEU 265, which governs the action for failure to act, is very abstract. For this reason, a whole procedure under the article 265 TFEU was developed by the EU courts. The original purpose of the action for failure to act was to constitute whether European Union (EU) institution properly fulfilled its obligations under the EU legislation. However, in the course of case-law, a mere EU institution's express refusal to fulfill its duties became sufficient to constitute that the EU institution acted and therefore action for failure to act became devoid of purpose. This article analyzes whether the action for failure to act has lost its purpose and become an ineffective legal remedy in the system of judicial review in the EU. Additionally, the action for failure to act is compared to similar national actions.

AB - This article analyzes the purpose of the action for failure to act under article 265 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The statements are derived from the analysis of scientific literature, relevant legislation, practice of the European Union Court of Justice (CJEU) and the European Union General Court (EUGC). Useful information has also been obtained from the opinions of general advocates of the CJEU. The article of TFEU 265, which governs the action for failure to act, is very abstract. For this reason, a whole procedure under the article 265 TFEU was developed by the EU courts. The original purpose of the action for failure to act was to constitute whether European Union (EU) institution properly fulfilled its obligations under the EU legislation. However, in the course of case-law, a mere EU institution's express refusal to fulfill its duties became sufficient to constitute that the EU institution acted and therefore action for failure to act became devoid of purpose. This article analyzes whether the action for failure to act has lost its purpose and become an ineffective legal remedy in the system of judicial review in the EU. Additionally, the action for failure to act is compared to similar national actions.

KW - Action for failure to act

KW - article 265 TFEU

KW - European Union

KW - judicial protection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925453688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925453688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/bjlp-2015-0008

DO - 10.1515/bjlp-2015-0008

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 209

EP - 226

JO - Baltic Journal of Law and Politics

JF - Baltic Journal of Law and Politics

SN - 2029-0454

IS - 2

ER -