Insolvable issues of ineffective individual redress for torture in Syria: unavoidable or inevitable?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Repelled by the outrages effects of the systematic ill-treatment of human beings during the WWII and its aftermath, the international community agreed to prohibit the use of torture in the 20th century. Yet, the absolute prohibition seems to exist only on paper. The recent examples of systematic torture in Syrian “black sites” call again the question of the efficiency of the legal framework for the redress of damage suffered by individuals due to deliberate actions of torture inflicted by state officials amidst loud political declarations of various actors of international community. Although the right to the redress may be realized through various schemes under international human rights treaties, the legal remedies seem to rather exist than live for Syrians. They are inaccessible to the victims of torturous acts due to the lack of recognition of the most relevant competences of the relevant human rights bodies by Syrian state. Unfortunately, the measures of criminal justice are ineffective or unapproachable either and it does not look like the punishable may be punished in the anytime soon.
LanguageEnglish
Pages55-66
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Comparative Jurisprudence
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

torture
Syria
human rights
legal remedies
treaty
community
damages
justice
efficiency
human being
lack

Keywords

  • Syria
  • torture
  • criminal responsibility

Cite this

@article{fe030ecdd9b84fc49719413f05c0dcad,
title = "Insolvable issues of ineffective individual redress for torture in Syria: unavoidable or inevitable?",
abstract = "Repelled by the outrages effects of the systematic ill-treatment of human beings during the WWII and its aftermath, the international community agreed to prohibit the use of torture in the 20th century. Yet, the absolute prohibition seems to exist only on paper. The recent examples of systematic torture in Syrian “black sites” call again the question of the efficiency of the legal framework for the redress of damage suffered by individuals due to deliberate actions of torture inflicted by state officials amidst loud political declarations of various actors of international community. Although the right to the redress may be realized through various schemes under international human rights treaties, the legal remedies seem to rather exist than live for Syrians. They are inaccessible to the victims of torturous acts due to the lack of recognition of the most relevant competences of the relevant human rights bodies by Syrian state. Unfortunately, the measures of criminal justice are ineffective or unapproachable either and it does not look like the punishable may be punished in the anytime soon.",
keywords = "Syria, torture, criminal responsibility",
author = "Regina Valutytė",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.13165/j.icj. 2017.03.005",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "55--66",
journal = "International Comparative Jurisprudence",
issn = "2351-6674",
publisher = "Mykolas Romeris University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insolvable issues of ineffective individual redress for torture in Syria

T2 - International Comparative Jurisprudence

AU - Valutytė ,Regina

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Repelled by the outrages effects of the systematic ill-treatment of human beings during the WWII and its aftermath, the international community agreed to prohibit the use of torture in the 20th century. Yet, the absolute prohibition seems to exist only on paper. The recent examples of systematic torture in Syrian “black sites” call again the question of the efficiency of the legal framework for the redress of damage suffered by individuals due to deliberate actions of torture inflicted by state officials amidst loud political declarations of various actors of international community. Although the right to the redress may be realized through various schemes under international human rights treaties, the legal remedies seem to rather exist than live for Syrians. They are inaccessible to the victims of torturous acts due to the lack of recognition of the most relevant competences of the relevant human rights bodies by Syrian state. Unfortunately, the measures of criminal justice are ineffective or unapproachable either and it does not look like the punishable may be punished in the anytime soon.

AB - Repelled by the outrages effects of the systematic ill-treatment of human beings during the WWII and its aftermath, the international community agreed to prohibit the use of torture in the 20th century. Yet, the absolute prohibition seems to exist only on paper. The recent examples of systematic torture in Syrian “black sites” call again the question of the efficiency of the legal framework for the redress of damage suffered by individuals due to deliberate actions of torture inflicted by state officials amidst loud political declarations of various actors of international community. Although the right to the redress may be realized through various schemes under international human rights treaties, the legal remedies seem to rather exist than live for Syrians. They are inaccessible to the victims of torturous acts due to the lack of recognition of the most relevant competences of the relevant human rights bodies by Syrian state. Unfortunately, the measures of criminal justice are ineffective or unapproachable either and it does not look like the punishable may be punished in the anytime soon.

KW - Syria

KW - torture

KW - criminal responsibility

U2 - 10.13165/j.icj. 2017.03.005

DO - 10.13165/j.icj. 2017.03.005

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 55

EP - 66

JO - International Comparative Jurisprudence

JF - International Comparative Jurisprudence

SN - 2351-6674

IS - 1

ER -