Is there a need for an extension of subsidiary protection in the European Union qualification directive?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The establishment of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) by 2012 remains a key policy objective for the European Union (EU). According to the Council of the European Union, the development of a Common Asylum Policy should be based on a full and inclusive application of the 1951 Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (“the 1951 Refugee Convention”) and other relevant international treaties. In the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum attention is brought to the persistence of wide disparities amongst Member States (MSs, MS) in the granting of protection and the form of protection granted. This is seen as one of the main problems to be addressed in building the CEAS. It is fairly obvious that existing divergences in policy have a substantial impact upon the aims of the CEAS. It can be assumed that the difference in governmental practices involving recognizing asylum seekers on refugee grounds or subsidiary protection grounds may be a substantial factor in the decision-making process on where to apply for international protection. The European Commission stressed the importance, during the second phase of the CEAS, of paying particular attention to subsidiary and other forms of protection. This Article analyses the need to expand subsidiary protection to additional groups of individuals at the EU level in order to fully align the provisions of the EU Qualification Directive with international human rights law. This would contribute to the asylum law harmonisation objectives of the Directive, as well as lay a foundation for the establishment of the CEAS. The Article may be of interest to national and European asylum and refugee law policy makers, as well as decision makers, non-governmental organisations and scholars interested in the gaps of EU asylum instruments and possible solutions to remedy it.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-232
JournalJurisprudencija: mokslo darbai
Volume120
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

qualification
refugee
European Council of Ministers
refugee law
Geneva Convention
asylum policy
Law
asylum seeker
international agreement
harmonization
European Commission
divergence
decision-making process
remedies
persistence
decision maker
immigration
human rights
Group

Keywords

  • Refugees
  • Legal status of foreigners
  • International human rights law

Cite this

@article{475de31d3b344f948264532d80c2969f,
title = "Is there a need for an extension of subsidiary protection in the European Union qualification directive?",
abstract = "The establishment of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) by 2012 remains a key policy objective for the European Union (EU). According to the Council of the European Union, the development of a Common Asylum Policy should be based on a full and inclusive application of the 1951 Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (“the 1951 Refugee Convention”) and other relevant international treaties. In the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum attention is brought to the persistence of wide disparities amongst Member States (MSs, MS) in the granting of protection and the form of protection granted. This is seen as one of the main problems to be addressed in building the CEAS. It is fairly obvious that existing divergences in policy have a substantial impact upon the aims of the CEAS. It can be assumed that the difference in governmental practices involving recognizing asylum seekers on refugee grounds or subsidiary protection grounds may be a substantial factor in the decision-making process on where to apply for international protection. The European Commission stressed the importance, during the second phase of the CEAS, of paying particular attention to subsidiary and other forms of protection. This Article analyses the need to expand subsidiary protection to additional groups of individuals at the EU level in order to fully align the provisions of the EU Qualification Directive with international human rights law. This would contribute to the asylum law harmonisation objectives of the Directive, as well as lay a foundation for the establishment of the CEAS. The Article may be of interest to national and European asylum and refugee law policy makers, as well as decision makers, non-governmental organisations and scholars interested in the gaps of EU asylum instruments and possible solutions to remedy it.",
keywords = "Refugees, Legal status of foreigners, International human rights law",
author = "Lyra Jakuleviciene",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "215--232",
journal = "Jurisprudencija: mokslo darbai",
issn = "1392-6195",
publisher = "Mykolas Romeris University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there a need for an extension of subsidiary protection in the European Union qualification directive?

AU - Jakuleviciene, Lyra

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The establishment of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) by 2012 remains a key policy objective for the European Union (EU). According to the Council of the European Union, the development of a Common Asylum Policy should be based on a full and inclusive application of the 1951 Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (“the 1951 Refugee Convention”) and other relevant international treaties. In the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum attention is brought to the persistence of wide disparities amongst Member States (MSs, MS) in the granting of protection and the form of protection granted. This is seen as one of the main problems to be addressed in building the CEAS. It is fairly obvious that existing divergences in policy have a substantial impact upon the aims of the CEAS. It can be assumed that the difference in governmental practices involving recognizing asylum seekers on refugee grounds or subsidiary protection grounds may be a substantial factor in the decision-making process on where to apply for international protection. The European Commission stressed the importance, during the second phase of the CEAS, of paying particular attention to subsidiary and other forms of protection. This Article analyses the need to expand subsidiary protection to additional groups of individuals at the EU level in order to fully align the provisions of the EU Qualification Directive with international human rights law. This would contribute to the asylum law harmonisation objectives of the Directive, as well as lay a foundation for the establishment of the CEAS. The Article may be of interest to national and European asylum and refugee law policy makers, as well as decision makers, non-governmental organisations and scholars interested in the gaps of EU asylum instruments and possible solutions to remedy it.

AB - The establishment of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) by 2012 remains a key policy objective for the European Union (EU). According to the Council of the European Union, the development of a Common Asylum Policy should be based on a full and inclusive application of the 1951 Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (“the 1951 Refugee Convention”) and other relevant international treaties. In the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum attention is brought to the persistence of wide disparities amongst Member States (MSs, MS) in the granting of protection and the form of protection granted. This is seen as one of the main problems to be addressed in building the CEAS. It is fairly obvious that existing divergences in policy have a substantial impact upon the aims of the CEAS. It can be assumed that the difference in governmental practices involving recognizing asylum seekers on refugee grounds or subsidiary protection grounds may be a substantial factor in the decision-making process on where to apply for international protection. The European Commission stressed the importance, during the second phase of the CEAS, of paying particular attention to subsidiary and other forms of protection. This Article analyses the need to expand subsidiary protection to additional groups of individuals at the EU level in order to fully align the provisions of the EU Qualification Directive with international human rights law. This would contribute to the asylum law harmonisation objectives of the Directive, as well as lay a foundation for the establishment of the CEAS. The Article may be of interest to national and European asylum and refugee law policy makers, as well as decision makers, non-governmental organisations and scholars interested in the gaps of EU asylum instruments and possible solutions to remedy it.

KW - Refugees

KW - Legal status of foreigners

KW - International human rights law

M3 - Article

VL - 120

SP - 215

EP - 232

JO - Jurisprudencija: mokslo darbai

JF - Jurisprudencija: mokslo darbai

SN - 1392-6195

IS - 2

ER -