Letting, die and mercy killing

Andrius Narbekovas, Kazys Meilius

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We are all called to make moral decisions, not only about preserving life and health, but also about accepting our death and dying. There are situations, when it is morally right, and indeed obligatory, to allow a dying person to die in peace and dignity. But there is a world of difference between allowing a peaceful death, and deliberately setting out to bring death of the person either by acts of commission (s.c. ‘active euthanasia’), or by acts of omission (s.c. ‘passive euthanasia’). The word “killing” seems proper for euthanasia, because “to kill” does mean “to intentionally cause the death of someone.” It can be morally acceptable to withhold or withdraw a treatment precisely because it is reasonably judged as inefficacious (futile), or excessively burdensome for the patient. One’s reason for withholding such treatment must not be a judgement about the desirability of putting an end to the patient’s life, but a judgement about the desirability of putting an end to the treatment, which is futile or burdensome.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2-7
    JournalMedical ethics & bioethics = Medicínska etika & bioetika
    Volume10
    Issue number3-4
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Fingerprint

    Mercy
    Killing
    Euthanasia
    Person
    Dying
    Omission
    Health
    Peace
    Causes
    Dignity

    Keywords

    • Euthanasia
    • Principle of double effect
    • Direct and indirect killing

    Cite this

    Letting, die and mercy killing. / Narbekovas, Andrius; Meilius, Kazys.

    In: Medical ethics & bioethics = Medicínska etika & bioetika, Vol. 10, No. 3-4, 2003, p. 2-7.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{6e4d4f31f4354e57b4060c4e8131f7c6,
    title = "Letting, die and mercy killing",
    abstract = "We are all called to make moral decisions, not only about preserving life and health, but also about accepting our death and dying. There are situations, when it is morally right, and indeed obligatory, to allow a dying person to die in peace and dignity. But there is a world of difference between allowing a peaceful death, and deliberately setting out to bring death of the person either by acts of commission (s.c. ‘active euthanasia’), or by acts of omission (s.c. ‘passive euthanasia’). The word “killing” seems proper for euthanasia, because “to kill” does mean “to intentionally cause the death of someone.” It can be morally acceptable to withhold or withdraw a treatment precisely because it is reasonably judged as inefficacious (futile), or excessively burdensome for the patient. One’s reason for withholding such treatment must not be a judgement about the desirability of putting an end to the patient’s life, but a judgement about the desirability of putting an end to the treatment, which is futile or burdensome.",
    keywords = "Euthanasia , Principle of double effect , Direct and indirect killing",
    author = "Andrius Narbekovas and Kazys Meilius",
    year = "2003",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "2--7",
    journal = "Medicínska etika a bioetika : casopis Ústavu medicínskej etiky a bioetiky = Medical ethics & bioethics : journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics & Bioethics",
    issn = "1335-0560",
    publisher = "Charis Pub. House",
    number = "3-4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Letting, die and mercy killing

    AU - Narbekovas, Andrius

    AU - Meilius, Kazys

    PY - 2003

    Y1 - 2003

    N2 - We are all called to make moral decisions, not only about preserving life and health, but also about accepting our death and dying. There are situations, when it is morally right, and indeed obligatory, to allow a dying person to die in peace and dignity. But there is a world of difference between allowing a peaceful death, and deliberately setting out to bring death of the person either by acts of commission (s.c. ‘active euthanasia’), or by acts of omission (s.c. ‘passive euthanasia’). The word “killing” seems proper for euthanasia, because “to kill” does mean “to intentionally cause the death of someone.” It can be morally acceptable to withhold or withdraw a treatment precisely because it is reasonably judged as inefficacious (futile), or excessively burdensome for the patient. One’s reason for withholding such treatment must not be a judgement about the desirability of putting an end to the patient’s life, but a judgement about the desirability of putting an end to the treatment, which is futile or burdensome.

    AB - We are all called to make moral decisions, not only about preserving life and health, but also about accepting our death and dying. There are situations, when it is morally right, and indeed obligatory, to allow a dying person to die in peace and dignity. But there is a world of difference between allowing a peaceful death, and deliberately setting out to bring death of the person either by acts of commission (s.c. ‘active euthanasia’), or by acts of omission (s.c. ‘passive euthanasia’). The word “killing” seems proper for euthanasia, because “to kill” does mean “to intentionally cause the death of someone.” It can be morally acceptable to withhold or withdraw a treatment precisely because it is reasonably judged as inefficacious (futile), or excessively burdensome for the patient. One’s reason for withholding such treatment must not be a judgement about the desirability of putting an end to the patient’s life, but a judgement about the desirability of putting an end to the treatment, which is futile or burdensome.

    KW - Euthanasia

    KW - Principle of double effect

    KW - Direct and indirect killing

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 2

    EP - 7

    JO - Medicínska etika a bioetika : casopis Ústavu medicínskej etiky a bioetiky = Medical ethics & bioethics : journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics & Bioethics

    JF - Medicínska etika a bioetika : casopis Ústavu medicínskej etiky a bioetiky = Medical ethics & bioethics : journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics & Bioethics

    SN - 1335-0560

    IS - 3-4

    ER -