Lithuanian version of measure of positive youth development based on the Five Cs model

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The Five Cs model of PYD and associated instruments have received sound empirical support in the USA, but little validation in other cultural contexts. Moreover, initially measured as a second-order factor model, recently it has been reconsidered as a bifactor model. Our study aimed to compare the two proposed structures of the Five Cs model (second order vs. bifactor) and test whether the measure based on the Five Cs model was a valid instrument for use with Lithuanian adolescents. Analysis using the data of 1686 adolescents aged 14–20 (Mage = 16.61, SDage = 1.23, 52.8% girls) revealed that the bifactor PYD model fit well with the Lithuanian data and accounted for the variance in the data better than the second-order PYD model. Support for the bifactor model suggests that manifestations of the Five Cs can be partly explained by the general construct of PYD. Besides, the Five Cs may also have manifestations and associations that are independent of PYD. Further analyses of the Lithuanian version of PYD instrument supported invariance of the bifactor structure across gender groups, grade levels and socio-economic statuses. The study also demonstrated construct validity and internal consistency of PYD and all Cs, except competence. Overall, our findings suggest that the Lithuanian version of the measure can be used with late adolescents for assessment of PYD and the Five Cs in Lithuania.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)701-717
    Number of pages17
    JournalEuropean Journal of Developmental Psychology
    Volume12
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2 2015

    Fingerprint

    Lithuania
    Mental Competency
    Economics

    Keywords

    • adolescence
    • factor analysis
    • Positive youth development

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Developmental and Educational Psychology
    • Social Psychology

    Cite this

    @article{93d420523986486897cb51e3a1ae8099,
    title = "Lithuanian version of measure of positive youth development based on the Five Cs model",
    abstract = "The Five Cs model of PYD and associated instruments have received sound empirical support in the USA, but little validation in other cultural contexts. Moreover, initially measured as a second-order factor model, recently it has been reconsidered as a bifactor model. Our study aimed to compare the two proposed structures of the Five Cs model (second order vs. bifactor) and test whether the measure based on the Five Cs model was a valid instrument for use with Lithuanian adolescents. Analysis using the data of 1686 adolescents aged 14–20 (Mage = 16.61, SDage = 1.23, 52.8{\%} girls) revealed that the bifactor PYD model fit well with the Lithuanian data and accounted for the variance in the data better than the second-order PYD model. Support for the bifactor model suggests that manifestations of the Five Cs can be partly explained by the general construct of PYD. Besides, the Five Cs may also have manifestations and associations that are independent of PYD. Further analyses of the Lithuanian version of PYD instrument supported invariance of the bifactor structure across gender groups, grade levels and socio-economic statuses. The study also demonstrated construct validity and internal consistency of PYD and all Cs, except competence. Overall, our findings suggest that the Lithuanian version of the measure can be used with late adolescents for assessment of PYD and the Five Cs in Lithuania.",
    keywords = "adolescence, factor analysis, Positive youth development",
    author = "Rasa Erentaitė and Saulė Raižienė",
    year = "2015",
    month = "11",
    day = "2",
    doi = "10.1080/17405629.2015.1091772",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "701--717",
    journal = "European Journal of Developmental Psychology",
    issn = "1740-5629",
    publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
    number = "6",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Lithuanian version of measure of positive youth development based on the Five Cs model

    AU - Erentaitė, Rasa

    AU - Raižienė, Saulė

    PY - 2015/11/2

    Y1 - 2015/11/2

    N2 - The Five Cs model of PYD and associated instruments have received sound empirical support in the USA, but little validation in other cultural contexts. Moreover, initially measured as a second-order factor model, recently it has been reconsidered as a bifactor model. Our study aimed to compare the two proposed structures of the Five Cs model (second order vs. bifactor) and test whether the measure based on the Five Cs model was a valid instrument for use with Lithuanian adolescents. Analysis using the data of 1686 adolescents aged 14–20 (Mage = 16.61, SDage = 1.23, 52.8% girls) revealed that the bifactor PYD model fit well with the Lithuanian data and accounted for the variance in the data better than the second-order PYD model. Support for the bifactor model suggests that manifestations of the Five Cs can be partly explained by the general construct of PYD. Besides, the Five Cs may also have manifestations and associations that are independent of PYD. Further analyses of the Lithuanian version of PYD instrument supported invariance of the bifactor structure across gender groups, grade levels and socio-economic statuses. The study also demonstrated construct validity and internal consistency of PYD and all Cs, except competence. Overall, our findings suggest that the Lithuanian version of the measure can be used with late adolescents for assessment of PYD and the Five Cs in Lithuania.

    AB - The Five Cs model of PYD and associated instruments have received sound empirical support in the USA, but little validation in other cultural contexts. Moreover, initially measured as a second-order factor model, recently it has been reconsidered as a bifactor model. Our study aimed to compare the two proposed structures of the Five Cs model (second order vs. bifactor) and test whether the measure based on the Five Cs model was a valid instrument for use with Lithuanian adolescents. Analysis using the data of 1686 adolescents aged 14–20 (Mage = 16.61, SDage = 1.23, 52.8% girls) revealed that the bifactor PYD model fit well with the Lithuanian data and accounted for the variance in the data better than the second-order PYD model. Support for the bifactor model suggests that manifestations of the Five Cs can be partly explained by the general construct of PYD. Besides, the Five Cs may also have manifestations and associations that are independent of PYD. Further analyses of the Lithuanian version of PYD instrument supported invariance of the bifactor structure across gender groups, grade levels and socio-economic statuses. The study also demonstrated construct validity and internal consistency of PYD and all Cs, except competence. Overall, our findings suggest that the Lithuanian version of the measure can be used with late adolescents for assessment of PYD and the Five Cs in Lithuania.

    KW - adolescence

    KW - factor analysis

    KW - Positive youth development

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951044893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951044893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/17405629.2015.1091772

    DO - 10.1080/17405629.2015.1091772

    M3 - Article

    VL - 12

    SP - 701

    EP - 717

    JO - European Journal of Developmental Psychology

    JF - European Journal of Developmental Psychology

    SN - 1740-5629

    IS - 6

    ER -