Mapping ecosystem services potential in Lithuania

Daniel Depellegrin, Paulo Pereira, Ieva Misiunė, Lukas Egarter-Vigl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research presents a geographic information systems (GIS)-based method for ecosystem services (ES) potential assessment in a case study for the Lithuanian national territory. The ES potential was assessed for 31 CORINE land-cover classes (CLC2006) together with 31 ES categorized into regulating, provisioning and cultural ES. An expert-based ranking approach using a two-dimensional ES matrix and a geospatial analysis was applied to determine total ES potential, spatial patterns and relations among multiple ES. Results showed that forest areas had the highest potential for ES delivery whereas ES potential in urban areas was lowest. The spatial autocorrelation of regulating and cultural ES were dispersed while provisioning ES were significantly clustered. The principal component analysis (PCA) identified five factors with distinctive geospatial distribution: Factor 1 – forest areas, Factor 2 – aquatic environments, Factor 3 – livestock farming and energy production, Factor 4 – agricultural food production and Factor 5 – mineral extraction sites. The plotting of Factors 1 and 2 accounted for 72.81% of variance and identified three ES bundles composed by specific ES types: Bundle 1 – forest ecosystems, Bundle 2 – marine and freshwater ecosystems and Bundle 3 – mixed provisioning ecosystems. Trade-offs occur between regulating and cultural ES against the provisioning ES crop production and livestock farming. We conclude that the presented ES assessment can support decision-makers in the development of strategies for natural resources management at national and regional level, support the identification of trade-offs and synergies among ES types and foster ES research in Lithuania.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Feb 25 2016

Fingerprint

Lithuania
ecosystem service
livestock farming
production factor
energy production
freshwater ecosystem
synergy
food production

Keywords

  • ecosystem services
  • GIS
  • land management
  • mapping
  • natural resources management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Mapping ecosystem services potential in Lithuania. / Depellegrin, Daniel; Pereira, Paulo; Misiunė, Ieva; Egarter-Vigl, Lukas.

In: International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 25.02.2016, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{78ee3460670d4e4986e74c4b48d9f365,
title = "Mapping ecosystem services potential in Lithuania",
abstract = "This research presents a geographic information systems (GIS)-based method for ecosystem services (ES) potential assessment in a case study for the Lithuanian national territory. The ES potential was assessed for 31 CORINE land-cover classes (CLC2006) together with 31 ES categorized into regulating, provisioning and cultural ES. An expert-based ranking approach using a two-dimensional ES matrix and a geospatial analysis was applied to determine total ES potential, spatial patterns and relations among multiple ES. Results showed that forest areas had the highest potential for ES delivery whereas ES potential in urban areas was lowest. The spatial autocorrelation of regulating and cultural ES were dispersed while provisioning ES were significantly clustered. The principal component analysis (PCA) identified five factors with distinctive geospatial distribution: Factor 1 – forest areas, Factor 2 – aquatic environments, Factor 3 – livestock farming and energy production, Factor 4 – agricultural food production and Factor 5 – mineral extraction sites. The plotting of Factors 1 and 2 accounted for 72.81{\%} of variance and identified three ES bundles composed by specific ES types: Bundle 1 – forest ecosystems, Bundle 2 – marine and freshwater ecosystems and Bundle 3 – mixed provisioning ecosystems. Trade-offs occur between regulating and cultural ES against the provisioning ES crop production and livestock farming. We conclude that the presented ES assessment can support decision-makers in the development of strategies for natural resources management at national and regional level, support the identification of trade-offs and synergies among ES types and foster ES research in Lithuania.",
keywords = "ecosystem services, GIS, land management, mapping, natural resources management",
author = "Daniel Depellegrin and Paulo Pereira and Ieva Misiunė and Lukas Egarter-Vigl",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1080/13504509.2016.1146176",
language = "English",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology",
issn = "1350-4509",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping ecosystem services potential in Lithuania

AU - Depellegrin, Daniel

AU - Pereira, Paulo

AU - Misiunė, Ieva

AU - Egarter-Vigl, Lukas

PY - 2016/2/25

Y1 - 2016/2/25

N2 - This research presents a geographic information systems (GIS)-based method for ecosystem services (ES) potential assessment in a case study for the Lithuanian national territory. The ES potential was assessed for 31 CORINE land-cover classes (CLC2006) together with 31 ES categorized into regulating, provisioning and cultural ES. An expert-based ranking approach using a two-dimensional ES matrix and a geospatial analysis was applied to determine total ES potential, spatial patterns and relations among multiple ES. Results showed that forest areas had the highest potential for ES delivery whereas ES potential in urban areas was lowest. The spatial autocorrelation of regulating and cultural ES were dispersed while provisioning ES were significantly clustered. The principal component analysis (PCA) identified five factors with distinctive geospatial distribution: Factor 1 – forest areas, Factor 2 – aquatic environments, Factor 3 – livestock farming and energy production, Factor 4 – agricultural food production and Factor 5 – mineral extraction sites. The plotting of Factors 1 and 2 accounted for 72.81% of variance and identified three ES bundles composed by specific ES types: Bundle 1 – forest ecosystems, Bundle 2 – marine and freshwater ecosystems and Bundle 3 – mixed provisioning ecosystems. Trade-offs occur between regulating and cultural ES against the provisioning ES crop production and livestock farming. We conclude that the presented ES assessment can support decision-makers in the development of strategies for natural resources management at national and regional level, support the identification of trade-offs and synergies among ES types and foster ES research in Lithuania.

AB - This research presents a geographic information systems (GIS)-based method for ecosystem services (ES) potential assessment in a case study for the Lithuanian national territory. The ES potential was assessed for 31 CORINE land-cover classes (CLC2006) together with 31 ES categorized into regulating, provisioning and cultural ES. An expert-based ranking approach using a two-dimensional ES matrix and a geospatial analysis was applied to determine total ES potential, spatial patterns and relations among multiple ES. Results showed that forest areas had the highest potential for ES delivery whereas ES potential in urban areas was lowest. The spatial autocorrelation of regulating and cultural ES were dispersed while provisioning ES were significantly clustered. The principal component analysis (PCA) identified five factors with distinctive geospatial distribution: Factor 1 – forest areas, Factor 2 – aquatic environments, Factor 3 – livestock farming and energy production, Factor 4 – agricultural food production and Factor 5 – mineral extraction sites. The plotting of Factors 1 and 2 accounted for 72.81% of variance and identified three ES bundles composed by specific ES types: Bundle 1 – forest ecosystems, Bundle 2 – marine and freshwater ecosystems and Bundle 3 – mixed provisioning ecosystems. Trade-offs occur between regulating and cultural ES against the provisioning ES crop production and livestock farming. We conclude that the presented ES assessment can support decision-makers in the development of strategies for natural resources management at national and regional level, support the identification of trade-offs and synergies among ES types and foster ES research in Lithuania.

KW - ecosystem services

KW - GIS

KW - land management

KW - mapping

KW - natural resources management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959055422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959055422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13504509.2016.1146176

DO - 10.1080/13504509.2016.1146176

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84959055422

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology

JF - International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology

SN - 1350-4509

ER -