Naturalist and hermeneutical topologies of science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Joseph Rouse’s philosophical program of cultural studies of scientific knowledge criticizes a radical distinction of nature-culture, as well as of scientific-nonscientific knowing and initiates a suspension of the conception of scientific autonomy. From the point of view of Dimitri Ginev’s cognitive existentialism, the cultural autonomy of science is a fundamental pillar of democracy, and naturalistic postmodern delocalization of science is seen as a scientification threat to culture and society. So to protect culture, society, democracy, and thus its own rights to scientific research, is the civil and academic obligation of hermeneutic narrative. In terms of cultural studies of scientific knowledge – on the contrary – the idea of the autonomy of science (which itself is the relic of modern narrative) promotes the cultural stigmatization of science, and hermeneutic phenomenology even encourages it. The article aims to compare neo-naturalist and hermeneutic- phenomenological topologies of science from the “meta-philosophical” perspective and to evaluate the terms of their cooperation.

Translated title of the contributionNaturalist and hermeneutical topologies of science
Original languageLithuanian
Pages (from-to)3-11
Number of pages9
JournalFilosofija, Sociologija
Volume26
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

hermeneutics
science
autonomy
cultural studies
scientification
existentialism
democracy
narrative
stigmatization
phenomenology
knowledge
obligation
Autonomy
Naturalists
Topology
threat
Cultural Studies
Hermeneutics
Scientific Knowledge
Democracy

Keywords

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Philosophy
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Natūralistinė ir hermeneutinė mokslo topologijos. / Juozelis, Evaldas.

    In: Filosofija, Sociologija, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2015, p. 3-11.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{dccf34693ce640779da73c2e848def02,
    title = "Natūralistinė ir hermeneutinė mokslo topologijos",
    abstract = "Joseph Rouse’s philosophical program of cultural studies of scientific knowledge criticizes a radical distinction of nature-culture, as well as of scientific-nonscientific knowing and initiates a suspension of the conception of scientific autonomy. From the point of view of Dimitri Ginev’s cognitive existentialism, the cultural autonomy of science is a fundamental pillar of democracy, and naturalistic postmodern delocalization of science is seen as a scientification threat to culture and society. So to protect culture, society, democracy, and thus its own rights to scientific research, is the civil and academic obligation of hermeneutic narrative. In terms of cultural studies of scientific knowledge – on the contrary – the idea of the autonomy of science (which itself is the relic of modern narrative) promotes the cultural stigmatization of science, and hermeneutic phenomenology even encourages it. The article aims to compare neo-naturalist and hermeneutic- phenomenological topologies of science from the “meta-philosophical” perspective and to evaluate the terms of their cooperation.",
    keywords = "Cognitive existentialism, Culture, Hermeneutic, Naturalist, Science",
    author = "Evaldas Juozelis",
    year = "2015",
    language = "Lithuanian",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "3--11",
    journal = "Filosofija Sociologija",
    issn = "0235-7186",
    publisher = "Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Publishers",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Natūralistinė ir hermeneutinė mokslo topologijos

    AU - Juozelis, Evaldas

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Joseph Rouse’s philosophical program of cultural studies of scientific knowledge criticizes a radical distinction of nature-culture, as well as of scientific-nonscientific knowing and initiates a suspension of the conception of scientific autonomy. From the point of view of Dimitri Ginev’s cognitive existentialism, the cultural autonomy of science is a fundamental pillar of democracy, and naturalistic postmodern delocalization of science is seen as a scientification threat to culture and society. So to protect culture, society, democracy, and thus its own rights to scientific research, is the civil and academic obligation of hermeneutic narrative. In terms of cultural studies of scientific knowledge – on the contrary – the idea of the autonomy of science (which itself is the relic of modern narrative) promotes the cultural stigmatization of science, and hermeneutic phenomenology even encourages it. The article aims to compare neo-naturalist and hermeneutic- phenomenological topologies of science from the “meta-philosophical” perspective and to evaluate the terms of their cooperation.

    AB - Joseph Rouse’s philosophical program of cultural studies of scientific knowledge criticizes a radical distinction of nature-culture, as well as of scientific-nonscientific knowing and initiates a suspension of the conception of scientific autonomy. From the point of view of Dimitri Ginev’s cognitive existentialism, the cultural autonomy of science is a fundamental pillar of democracy, and naturalistic postmodern delocalization of science is seen as a scientification threat to culture and society. So to protect culture, society, democracy, and thus its own rights to scientific research, is the civil and academic obligation of hermeneutic narrative. In terms of cultural studies of scientific knowledge – on the contrary – the idea of the autonomy of science (which itself is the relic of modern narrative) promotes the cultural stigmatization of science, and hermeneutic phenomenology even encourages it. The article aims to compare neo-naturalist and hermeneutic- phenomenological topologies of science from the “meta-philosophical” perspective and to evaluate the terms of their cooperation.

    KW - Cognitive existentialism

    KW - Culture

    KW - Hermeneutic

    KW - Naturalist

    KW - Science

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926353207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926353207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 26

    SP - 3

    EP - 11

    JO - Filosofija Sociologija

    JF - Filosofija Sociologija

    SN - 0235-7186

    IS - 1

    ER -