Objective justifications in predatory pricing

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Abuse of a dominant position is one of the key aspects in EC competition law. The Court of Justice and General Court acknowledge that sometimes the actions of dominant undertaking that might be recognized as abusive should not be prohibited on the basis of Article 102 TFEU, if undertaking provides objective justification or proves that its actions generate positive effect which outweighs negative outcome on competition. Therefore, actions that usually are regarded as predatory pricing, which is one of the forms of the abuse of a dominant position, in case of special circumstances might be recognized as legitimate. In the present case, attention should be devoted to objective justifications, since this provides the basis for evaluation of legitimate, pro-competitive reasons that explain why undertakings may establish prices lower than costs. This article is devoted to the analysis of objective justification, which might prove that allegedly abusive behaviour is actually legitimate. Plenty of factors might be recognized as objective justifications, therefore it is quite difficult to provide a finite list of justifications.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)213-232
    JournalJurisprudencija: mokslo darbai
    Volume1
    Issue number18
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    pricing
    abuse
    court of justice
    European Community
    Law
    costs
    evaluation

    Keywords

    • Abuse of dominant position
    • Objective justifications
    • Predatory pricing

    Cite this

    Objective justifications in predatory pricing. / Moisejevas, Raimundas.

    In: Jurisprudencija: mokslo darbai, Vol. 1, No. 18, 2011, p. 213-232.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{2b7a9e89fdab4834999e39948891b538,
    title = "Objective justifications in predatory pricing",
    abstract = "Abuse of a dominant position is one of the key aspects in EC competition law. The Court of Justice and General Court acknowledge that sometimes the actions of dominant undertaking that might be recognized as abusive should not be prohibited on the basis of Article 102 TFEU, if undertaking provides objective justification or proves that its actions generate positive effect which outweighs negative outcome on competition. Therefore, actions that usually are regarded as predatory pricing, which is one of the forms of the abuse of a dominant position, in case of special circumstances might be recognized as legitimate. In the present case, attention should be devoted to objective justifications, since this provides the basis for evaluation of legitimate, pro-competitive reasons that explain why undertakings may establish prices lower than costs. This article is devoted to the analysis of objective justification, which might prove that allegedly abusive behaviour is actually legitimate. Plenty of factors might be recognized as objective justifications, therefore it is quite difficult to provide a finite list of justifications.",
    keywords = "Abuse of dominant position , Objective justifications , Predatory pricing",
    author = "Raimundas Moisejevas",
    year = "2011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "1",
    pages = "213--232",
    journal = "Jurisprudencija: mokslo darbai",
    issn = "1392-6195",
    publisher = "Mykolas Romeris University",
    number = "18",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Objective justifications in predatory pricing

    AU - Moisejevas, Raimundas

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Abuse of a dominant position is one of the key aspects in EC competition law. The Court of Justice and General Court acknowledge that sometimes the actions of dominant undertaking that might be recognized as abusive should not be prohibited on the basis of Article 102 TFEU, if undertaking provides objective justification or proves that its actions generate positive effect which outweighs negative outcome on competition. Therefore, actions that usually are regarded as predatory pricing, which is one of the forms of the abuse of a dominant position, in case of special circumstances might be recognized as legitimate. In the present case, attention should be devoted to objective justifications, since this provides the basis for evaluation of legitimate, pro-competitive reasons that explain why undertakings may establish prices lower than costs. This article is devoted to the analysis of objective justification, which might prove that allegedly abusive behaviour is actually legitimate. Plenty of factors might be recognized as objective justifications, therefore it is quite difficult to provide a finite list of justifications.

    AB - Abuse of a dominant position is one of the key aspects in EC competition law. The Court of Justice and General Court acknowledge that sometimes the actions of dominant undertaking that might be recognized as abusive should not be prohibited on the basis of Article 102 TFEU, if undertaking provides objective justification or proves that its actions generate positive effect which outweighs negative outcome on competition. Therefore, actions that usually are regarded as predatory pricing, which is one of the forms of the abuse of a dominant position, in case of special circumstances might be recognized as legitimate. In the present case, attention should be devoted to objective justifications, since this provides the basis for evaluation of legitimate, pro-competitive reasons that explain why undertakings may establish prices lower than costs. This article is devoted to the analysis of objective justification, which might prove that allegedly abusive behaviour is actually legitimate. Plenty of factors might be recognized as objective justifications, therefore it is quite difficult to provide a finite list of justifications.

    KW - Abuse of dominant position

    KW - Objective justifications

    KW - Predatory pricing

    M3 - Article

    VL - 1

    SP - 213

    EP - 232

    JO - Jurisprudencija: mokslo darbai

    JF - Jurisprudencija: mokslo darbai

    SN - 1392-6195

    IS - 18

    ER -