On the potential to apply de minimis exemption for agreements containing hardcore restraints: European Union practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The article analyzes the possibility to apply de minimis exemption for agreements containing hardcore restraints. The statements are derived from analyses of scientific literature, relevant legislation, and the practice of courts and authorities responsible for competition maintenance. Current European Union legislation excludes agreements containing hardcore restraints from applying de minimis exemption. The early practice of the European Court of Justice (hereinafter – ECJ) and the newest national courts’ (e.g. Spain) decisions do not reflect this position. Furthermore, in 2010 the Netherlands broadened the application of de minimis exemption. The article approaches a wide range of possibilities rather than the dogmatic practice of de minimis exemption. Besides the analysis of relevant jurisprudence, the article also assesses competition law specialists’ opinions and possible solutions that proceed from the current situation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-69
JournalBaltic Journal of Law and Politics
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

exemption
legislation
dogmatics
European Court of Justice
technical literature
jurisprudence
Netherlands
Spain
Law

Keywords

  • Agreements
  • De minimis
  • Hardcore restraints
  • Impact
  • Competition

Cite this

@article{6d2a93f4a44341ebb9ebe180044c1152,
title = "On the potential to apply de minimis exemption for agreements containing hardcore restraints: European Union practice",
abstract = "The article analyzes the possibility to apply de minimis exemption for agreements containing hardcore restraints. The statements are derived from analyses of scientific literature, relevant legislation, and the practice of courts and authorities responsible for competition maintenance. Current European Union legislation excludes agreements containing hardcore restraints from applying de minimis exemption. The early practice of the European Court of Justice (hereinafter – ECJ) and the newest national courts’ (e.g. Spain) decisions do not reflect this position. Furthermore, in 2010 the Netherlands broadened the application of de minimis exemption. The article approaches a wide range of possibilities rather than the dogmatic practice of de minimis exemption. Besides the analysis of relevant jurisprudence, the article also assesses competition law specialists’ opinions and possible solutions that proceed from the current situation.",
keywords = "Agreements, De minimis, Hardcore restraints, Impact, Competition",
author = "Andrius Puksas",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.2478/v10076-012-0003-1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "46--69",
journal = "Baltic Journal of Law and Politics",
issn = "2029-0454",
publisher = "Versita (Central European Science Publishers)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the potential to apply de minimis exemption for agreements containing hardcore restraints

T2 - European Union practice

AU - Puksas, Andrius

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The article analyzes the possibility to apply de minimis exemption for agreements containing hardcore restraints. The statements are derived from analyses of scientific literature, relevant legislation, and the practice of courts and authorities responsible for competition maintenance. Current European Union legislation excludes agreements containing hardcore restraints from applying de minimis exemption. The early practice of the European Court of Justice (hereinafter – ECJ) and the newest national courts’ (e.g. Spain) decisions do not reflect this position. Furthermore, in 2010 the Netherlands broadened the application of de minimis exemption. The article approaches a wide range of possibilities rather than the dogmatic practice of de minimis exemption. Besides the analysis of relevant jurisprudence, the article also assesses competition law specialists’ opinions and possible solutions that proceed from the current situation.

AB - The article analyzes the possibility to apply de minimis exemption for agreements containing hardcore restraints. The statements are derived from analyses of scientific literature, relevant legislation, and the practice of courts and authorities responsible for competition maintenance. Current European Union legislation excludes agreements containing hardcore restraints from applying de minimis exemption. The early practice of the European Court of Justice (hereinafter – ECJ) and the newest national courts’ (e.g. Spain) decisions do not reflect this position. Furthermore, in 2010 the Netherlands broadened the application of de minimis exemption. The article approaches a wide range of possibilities rather than the dogmatic practice of de minimis exemption. Besides the analysis of relevant jurisprudence, the article also assesses competition law specialists’ opinions and possible solutions that proceed from the current situation.

KW - Agreements

KW - De minimis

KW - Hardcore restraints

KW - Impact

KW - Competition

U2 - 10.2478/v10076-012-0003-1

DO - 10.2478/v10076-012-0003-1

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 46

EP - 69

JO - Baltic Journal of Law and Politics

JF - Baltic Journal of Law and Politics

SN - 2029-0454

IS - 1

ER -