Participatory governance in the networks of stakeholders: Expression of collective identity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose — The main issue of stakeholders’ inclusion nowadays is the establishment of relationships between policy actors and creation of a supportive environment for stakeholder participation to allow a straight-forward stakeholder inclusion with a meaningful contribution to policy making. The concept of a collective identity describing how shared values, shared activities and a shared identity lead to social cohesion between a large number of people, could suggest a hint for stakeholder empowerment. We argue that a proper inclusion leads towards empowerment of stakeholders only where efforts to build collective identity are allocated. Otherwise, stakeholder inclusion is only about static participatory governance where knowledge collection predominates over knowledge sharing and co-production. The goal of the present chapter is to trace formal governance networks as a participatory governance mechanism and analyse stakeholder perspectives to be empowered to act in a formal governance network presuming that the network structure creates an environment where a collective identity is being built. Methodology/approach — The formal governance networks of 2013 led by the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Economy and Ministry of Education and Science were reconstructed on the bases of documents available in the organisations. The structure of the governance networks of 2013 is analysed as a precondition for an organisational collective identity to form. Findings — The structure of the governance networks leads us to the conclusion that stakeholders are expected to be knowledge providers instead of being knowledge co-producers. Originality/value — The networks demonstrate that the process of sharing knowledge and values is not recognised as an important element of participatory groups and efforts made to build a collective identity are too scarce.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-273
Number of pages27
JournalStudies in Public and Non-Profit Governance
Volume4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

collective identity
stakeholder
governance
inclusion
ministry
empowerment
Values
coproduction
Ministry of Education
social cohesion
producer
participation
economy
present
methodology
science
health
knowledge

Keywords

  • Collective identity
  • Participatory governance
  • Social cohesion
  • Social network analysis
  • Stakeholder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{d1cb588d888d4927b31fab22a90bebf5,
title = "Participatory governance in the networks of stakeholders: Expression of collective identity",
abstract = "Purpose — The main issue of stakeholders’ inclusion nowadays is the establishment of relationships between policy actors and creation of a supportive environment for stakeholder participation to allow a straight-forward stakeholder inclusion with a meaningful contribution to policy making. The concept of a collective identity describing how shared values, shared activities and a shared identity lead to social cohesion between a large number of people, could suggest a hint for stakeholder empowerment. We argue that a proper inclusion leads towards empowerment of stakeholders only where efforts to build collective identity are allocated. Otherwise, stakeholder inclusion is only about static participatory governance where knowledge collection predominates over knowledge sharing and co-production. The goal of the present chapter is to trace formal governance networks as a participatory governance mechanism and analyse stakeholder perspectives to be empowered to act in a formal governance network presuming that the network structure creates an environment where a collective identity is being built. Methodology/approach — The formal governance networks of 2013 led by the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Economy and Ministry of Education and Science were reconstructed on the bases of documents available in the organisations. The structure of the governance networks of 2013 is analysed as a precondition for an organisational collective identity to form. Findings — The structure of the governance networks leads us to the conclusion that stakeholders are expected to be knowledge providers instead of being knowledge co-producers. Originality/value — The networks demonstrate that the process of sharing knowledge and values is not recognised as an important element of participatory groups and efforts made to build a collective identity are too scarce.",
keywords = "Collective identity, Participatory governance, Social cohesion, Social network analysis, Stakeholder",
author = "Birutė Mikulskienė",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1108/S2051-663020150000004009",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "247--273",
journal = "Studies in Public and Non-Profit Governance",
issn = "2051-6630",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participatory governance in the networks of stakeholders

T2 - Expression of collective identity

AU - Mikulskienė, Birutė

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose — The main issue of stakeholders’ inclusion nowadays is the establishment of relationships between policy actors and creation of a supportive environment for stakeholder participation to allow a straight-forward stakeholder inclusion with a meaningful contribution to policy making. The concept of a collective identity describing how shared values, shared activities and a shared identity lead to social cohesion between a large number of people, could suggest a hint for stakeholder empowerment. We argue that a proper inclusion leads towards empowerment of stakeholders only where efforts to build collective identity are allocated. Otherwise, stakeholder inclusion is only about static participatory governance where knowledge collection predominates over knowledge sharing and co-production. The goal of the present chapter is to trace formal governance networks as a participatory governance mechanism and analyse stakeholder perspectives to be empowered to act in a formal governance network presuming that the network structure creates an environment where a collective identity is being built. Methodology/approach — The formal governance networks of 2013 led by the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Economy and Ministry of Education and Science were reconstructed on the bases of documents available in the organisations. The structure of the governance networks of 2013 is analysed as a precondition for an organisational collective identity to form. Findings — The structure of the governance networks leads us to the conclusion that stakeholders are expected to be knowledge providers instead of being knowledge co-producers. Originality/value — The networks demonstrate that the process of sharing knowledge and values is not recognised as an important element of participatory groups and efforts made to build a collective identity are too scarce.

AB - Purpose — The main issue of stakeholders’ inclusion nowadays is the establishment of relationships between policy actors and creation of a supportive environment for stakeholder participation to allow a straight-forward stakeholder inclusion with a meaningful contribution to policy making. The concept of a collective identity describing how shared values, shared activities and a shared identity lead to social cohesion between a large number of people, could suggest a hint for stakeholder empowerment. We argue that a proper inclusion leads towards empowerment of stakeholders only where efforts to build collective identity are allocated. Otherwise, stakeholder inclusion is only about static participatory governance where knowledge collection predominates over knowledge sharing and co-production. The goal of the present chapter is to trace formal governance networks as a participatory governance mechanism and analyse stakeholder perspectives to be empowered to act in a formal governance network presuming that the network structure creates an environment where a collective identity is being built. Methodology/approach — The formal governance networks of 2013 led by the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Economy and Ministry of Education and Science were reconstructed on the bases of documents available in the organisations. The structure of the governance networks of 2013 is analysed as a precondition for an organisational collective identity to form. Findings — The structure of the governance networks leads us to the conclusion that stakeholders are expected to be knowledge providers instead of being knowledge co-producers. Originality/value — The networks demonstrate that the process of sharing knowledge and values is not recognised as an important element of participatory groups and efforts made to build a collective identity are too scarce.

KW - Collective identity

KW - Participatory governance

KW - Social cohesion

KW - Social network analysis

KW - Stakeholder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946828632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946828632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S2051-663020150000004009

DO - 10.1108/S2051-663020150000004009

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 247

EP - 273

JO - Studies in Public and Non-Profit Governance

JF - Studies in Public and Non-Profit Governance

SN - 2051-6630

ER -