Pofroidistinė mokslo filosofijos terapija

Translated title of the contribution: Post-freudian theraphy for the philosophy of science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Authorities of the philosophy of science Karl Popper and Adolf Grünbaum jointly repudiated the potential status of psychoanalysis as scientific edifice, though for particular methodological reasons. In the tradition of analytical philosophy psychoanalysis is widely considered pseudoscientific, despite the significant decrease of rationalist and positivist influence on philosophical discourse. However, during the last few decades moderate approaches of scientific knowledge evolved and appropriate socio-cultural and intellectual medium emerged, proposing particular therapies of post-Freudian psychoanalysis for the philosophy of science itself, since it allegedly suffers from certain ideological and methodological neuroses. Some authors, while offering certain remedies for academic discourse, insist on scientific status of psychoanalysis, others are certain that scientific status for psychoanalysis is neither necessary nor acceptable.

Original languageLithuanian
Pages (from-to)153-162
Number of pages10
JournalProblemos
Volume82
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Sigmund Freud
Philosophy of Science
Psychoanalysis
Neurosis
Authority
Scientific Knowledge
Academic Discourse
Therapy
Karl Popper
Positivist
Freudian Psychoanalysis
Analytical philosophy
Rationalist
Philosophical Discourse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

Pofroidistinė mokslo filosofijos terapija. / Juozelis, Evaldas.

In: Problemos, Vol. 82, 2012, p. 153-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{62f2e9717da4404aa49ee29f1fed8e33,
title = "Pofroidistinė mokslo filosofijos terapija",
abstract = "Authorities of the philosophy of science Karl Popper and Adolf Gr{\"u}nbaum jointly repudiated the potential status of psychoanalysis as scientific edifice, though for particular methodological reasons. In the tradition of analytical philosophy psychoanalysis is widely considered pseudoscientific, despite the significant decrease of rationalist and positivist influence on philosophical discourse. However, during the last few decades moderate approaches of scientific knowledge evolved and appropriate socio-cultural and intellectual medium emerged, proposing particular therapies of post-Freudian psychoanalysis for the philosophy of science itself, since it allegedly suffers from certain ideological and methodological neuroses. Some authors, while offering certain remedies for academic discourse, insist on scientific status of psychoanalysis, others are certain that scientific status for psychoanalysis is neither necessary nor acceptable.",
keywords = "A. Gr{\"u}nbaum, K. Popper, N. Maxwell, Neurosis, Philosophy of science, Psychoanalysis",
author = "Evaldas Juozelis",
year = "2012",
language = "Lithuanian",
volume = "82",
pages = "153--162",
journal = "Problemos",
issn = "1392-1126",
publisher = "Vilnius university",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pofroidistinė mokslo filosofijos terapija

AU - Juozelis, Evaldas

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Authorities of the philosophy of science Karl Popper and Adolf Grünbaum jointly repudiated the potential status of psychoanalysis as scientific edifice, though for particular methodological reasons. In the tradition of analytical philosophy psychoanalysis is widely considered pseudoscientific, despite the significant decrease of rationalist and positivist influence on philosophical discourse. However, during the last few decades moderate approaches of scientific knowledge evolved and appropriate socio-cultural and intellectual medium emerged, proposing particular therapies of post-Freudian psychoanalysis for the philosophy of science itself, since it allegedly suffers from certain ideological and methodological neuroses. Some authors, while offering certain remedies for academic discourse, insist on scientific status of psychoanalysis, others are certain that scientific status for psychoanalysis is neither necessary nor acceptable.

AB - Authorities of the philosophy of science Karl Popper and Adolf Grünbaum jointly repudiated the potential status of psychoanalysis as scientific edifice, though for particular methodological reasons. In the tradition of analytical philosophy psychoanalysis is widely considered pseudoscientific, despite the significant decrease of rationalist and positivist influence on philosophical discourse. However, during the last few decades moderate approaches of scientific knowledge evolved and appropriate socio-cultural and intellectual medium emerged, proposing particular therapies of post-Freudian psychoanalysis for the philosophy of science itself, since it allegedly suffers from certain ideological and methodological neuroses. Some authors, while offering certain remedies for academic discourse, insist on scientific status of psychoanalysis, others are certain that scientific status for psychoanalysis is neither necessary nor acceptable.

KW - A. Grünbaum

KW - K. Popper

KW - N. Maxwell

KW - Neurosis

KW - Philosophy of science

KW - Psychoanalysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868354156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868354156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 153

EP - 162

JO - Problemos

JF - Problemos

SN - 1392-1126

ER -