Privati ar valstybinė odontologinė gydymo i̧staiga? Lietuvos pacientų nuomonė ir patirtis

Translated title of the contribution: Private or public dental care? Patients' perception and experience in Lithuania

Alina Puriene, Jadvyga Petrauskiene, Irena Balčiuniene, Vilija Janulyte, Jelena Kutkauskiene, Margarita Musteikyte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare demographic and social groups of patients, their satisfaction with services in public and private dental institutions. Material and methods: A random sample of 3000 Lithuanian residents was selected; 1801 participants answered a postal questionnaire. The response rate was 60.0%. Univariate analysis, χ2 criterion, z-test, and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between institution type, demographic and social characteristics of the respondents. Results: Less than half of Lithuanian residents (41.2%) visited public dental institutions, 35.9% - private, 25.9% - both. They preferred private dental sector due to better quality of service, public - due to closeness to residence or being the treatment place of acquaintances. Patients visiting public institutions required cheaper treatment, while patients visiting private institutions - qualitative, though more expensive, using modern technologies. The number of dental visits in the past year was lower in public institutions than in private ones. The majority of patients treated in public, private, and both institutions were satisfied with dental services. The least satisfied were visiting both institutions. More respondents with secondary and lower education used public services as compared to those with higher education. Urban population visited public institutions more often than rural population. Respondents with a monthly income of less than 500 Lt for one family member used public dental services more often than those receiving a higher income. Older patients visited public dental institutions more often than younger ones. Conclusions: More Lithuanian residents are treated in public dental institutions (up to 67.1%) than in private. Older, receiving lower income patients preferred public institutions. The majority of patients in public clinics as well as in private sector are satisfied with the service. Those who visited both types of institutions were least satisfied with dental services.

Original languageLithuanian
Pages (from-to)805-811
Number of pages7
JournalMedicina
Volume44
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Lithuania
Dental Care
Tooth
Private Sector
Demography
Education
Urban Population
Rural Population
Patient Satisfaction
Logistic Models
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Puriene, A., Petrauskiene, J., Balčiuniene, I., Janulyte, V., Kutkauskiene, J., & Musteikyte, M. (2008). Privati ar valstybinė odontologinė gydymo i̧staiga? Lietuvos pacientų nuomonė ir patirtis. Medicina, 44(10), 805-811.

Privati ar valstybinė odontologinė gydymo i̧staiga? Lietuvos pacientų nuomonė ir patirtis. / Puriene, Alina; Petrauskiene, Jadvyga; Balčiuniene, Irena; Janulyte, Vilija; Kutkauskiene, Jelena; Musteikyte, Margarita.

In: Medicina, Vol. 44, No. 10, 2008, p. 805-811.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Puriene, A, Petrauskiene, J, Balčiuniene, I, Janulyte, V, Kutkauskiene, J & Musteikyte, M 2008, 'Privati ar valstybinė odontologinė gydymo i̧staiga? Lietuvos pacientų nuomonė ir patirtis', Medicina, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 805-811.
Puriene A, Petrauskiene J, Balčiuniene I, Janulyte V, Kutkauskiene J, Musteikyte M. Privati ar valstybinė odontologinė gydymo i̧staiga? Lietuvos pacientų nuomonė ir patirtis. Medicina. 2008;44(10):805-811.
Puriene, Alina ; Petrauskiene, Jadvyga ; Balčiuniene, Irena ; Janulyte, Vilija ; Kutkauskiene, Jelena ; Musteikyte, Margarita. / Privati ar valstybinė odontologinė gydymo i̧staiga? Lietuvos pacientų nuomonė ir patirtis. In: Medicina. 2008 ; Vol. 44, No. 10. pp. 805-811.
@article{41de38c4b8e84e9b9ff64f934719590d,
title = "Privati ar valstybinė odontologinė gydymo i̧staiga? Lietuvos pacientų nuomonė ir patirtis",
abstract = "Objective: To compare demographic and social groups of patients, their satisfaction with services in public and private dental institutions. Material and methods: A random sample of 3000 Lithuanian residents was selected; 1801 participants answered a postal questionnaire. The response rate was 60.0{\%}. Univariate analysis, χ2 criterion, z-test, and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between institution type, demographic and social characteristics of the respondents. Results: Less than half of Lithuanian residents (41.2{\%}) visited public dental institutions, 35.9{\%} - private, 25.9{\%} - both. They preferred private dental sector due to better quality of service, public - due to closeness to residence or being the treatment place of acquaintances. Patients visiting public institutions required cheaper treatment, while patients visiting private institutions - qualitative, though more expensive, using modern technologies. The number of dental visits in the past year was lower in public institutions than in private ones. The majority of patients treated in public, private, and both institutions were satisfied with dental services. The least satisfied were visiting both institutions. More respondents with secondary and lower education used public services as compared to those with higher education. Urban population visited public institutions more often than rural population. Respondents with a monthly income of less than 500 Lt for one family member used public dental services more often than those receiving a higher income. Older patients visited public dental institutions more often than younger ones. Conclusions: More Lithuanian residents are treated in public dental institutions (up to 67.1{\%}) than in private. Older, receiving lower income patients preferred public institutions. The majority of patients in public clinics as well as in private sector are satisfied with the service. Those who visited both types of institutions were least satisfied with dental services.",
keywords = "Dental care, Public and private institutions, Satisfaction with service.",
author = "Alina Puriene and Jadvyga Petrauskiene and Irena Balčiuniene and Vilija Janulyte and Jelena Kutkauskiene and Margarita Musteikyte",
year = "2008",
language = "Lithuanian",
volume = "44",
pages = "805--811",
journal = "Medicina",
issn = "1010-660X",
publisher = "Kauno Medicinos Universitetas",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Privati ar valstybinė odontologinė gydymo i̧staiga? Lietuvos pacientų nuomonė ir patirtis

AU - Puriene, Alina

AU - Petrauskiene, Jadvyga

AU - Balčiuniene, Irena

AU - Janulyte, Vilija

AU - Kutkauskiene, Jelena

AU - Musteikyte, Margarita

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Objective: To compare demographic and social groups of patients, their satisfaction with services in public and private dental institutions. Material and methods: A random sample of 3000 Lithuanian residents was selected; 1801 participants answered a postal questionnaire. The response rate was 60.0%. Univariate analysis, χ2 criterion, z-test, and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between institution type, demographic and social characteristics of the respondents. Results: Less than half of Lithuanian residents (41.2%) visited public dental institutions, 35.9% - private, 25.9% - both. They preferred private dental sector due to better quality of service, public - due to closeness to residence or being the treatment place of acquaintances. Patients visiting public institutions required cheaper treatment, while patients visiting private institutions - qualitative, though more expensive, using modern technologies. The number of dental visits in the past year was lower in public institutions than in private ones. The majority of patients treated in public, private, and both institutions were satisfied with dental services. The least satisfied were visiting both institutions. More respondents with secondary and lower education used public services as compared to those with higher education. Urban population visited public institutions more often than rural population. Respondents with a monthly income of less than 500 Lt for one family member used public dental services more often than those receiving a higher income. Older patients visited public dental institutions more often than younger ones. Conclusions: More Lithuanian residents are treated in public dental institutions (up to 67.1%) than in private. Older, receiving lower income patients preferred public institutions. The majority of patients in public clinics as well as in private sector are satisfied with the service. Those who visited both types of institutions were least satisfied with dental services.

AB - Objective: To compare demographic and social groups of patients, their satisfaction with services in public and private dental institutions. Material and methods: A random sample of 3000 Lithuanian residents was selected; 1801 participants answered a postal questionnaire. The response rate was 60.0%. Univariate analysis, χ2 criterion, z-test, and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between institution type, demographic and social characteristics of the respondents. Results: Less than half of Lithuanian residents (41.2%) visited public dental institutions, 35.9% - private, 25.9% - both. They preferred private dental sector due to better quality of service, public - due to closeness to residence or being the treatment place of acquaintances. Patients visiting public institutions required cheaper treatment, while patients visiting private institutions - qualitative, though more expensive, using modern technologies. The number of dental visits in the past year was lower in public institutions than in private ones. The majority of patients treated in public, private, and both institutions were satisfied with dental services. The least satisfied were visiting both institutions. More respondents with secondary and lower education used public services as compared to those with higher education. Urban population visited public institutions more often than rural population. Respondents with a monthly income of less than 500 Lt for one family member used public dental services more often than those receiving a higher income. Older patients visited public dental institutions more often than younger ones. Conclusions: More Lithuanian residents are treated in public dental institutions (up to 67.1%) than in private. Older, receiving lower income patients preferred public institutions. The majority of patients in public clinics as well as in private sector are satisfied with the service. Those who visited both types of institutions were least satisfied with dental services.

KW - Dental care

KW - Public and private institutions

KW - Satisfaction with service.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69249106809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69249106809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19001839

AN - SCOPUS:69249106809

VL - 44

SP - 805

EP - 811

JO - Medicina

JF - Medicina

SN - 1010-660X

IS - 10

ER -