Klimato kaitos švelninimo priemoniu̧ parinkimas, taikant daugiakriterinius sprendimu̧ priėmimo metodus

Translated title of the contribution: Selection of climate change mitigation instruments using multi-criterion decision-aiding methods

Asta Mikalauskiene, Dalia Štreimikiene

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The main climate change mitigation tools can be grouped into the following categories: command and control methods, economic instruments, and voluntary instruments. Command and control instruments include technology-or performance-based standards. Economic instruments include tradable emission permits, feed-in tariffs for electricity purchase from renewables and CHP, competitive biding processes, green tradable certificates, and subsidies to consumers who purchase renewable energy equipment or renewable energy. Voluntary instruments include voluntary agreements of energy suppliers and generation disclosure rules. In the following text, we will provide some considerations of the performance of the described instruments with respect to a series of criteria that should be considered in choosing the instruments. These criteria should be based on sustainable development targets and can be expressed by specific indicators of sustainable development. The most important criteria for the selection of climate change mitigation measures are the following: efficiency, impact on energy prices, administrative costs, equity, flexibility, impact on the labour market, impact on technological innovations, security of supply, and emission reduction. Therefore, all these criteria should be taken into account during the selection of climate change mitigation tools. However, it is very difficult to select a single instrument that gives the best outcomes in terms of all these criteria. The choice of the instrument will require some trade-offs among these criteria. The conjoint choice analysis can help investigating how policy makers trade off the criteria when designing a climate change mitigation policy. In conjoint choice analysis techniques, respondents are shown various alternative representations which are described by a set of attributes, and are asked to choose those most preferred. These alternatives differ in the levels taken by two or more attributes. The application of the conjoint choice technique may shed light on the relative importance of criteria in order to suggest the choice of the optimal policy instrument. Some criteria or attributes can be expressed in monetary units, while some cannot be measured and are qualitative, therefore conjoint choice analysis helps to evaluate the marginal costs of some criteria based on a conjoint choice experiment. A simple application of the conjoint choice methodology can be an example of car selection on the market. When we buy a car, we compare the levels taken by the attributes that describe them. A car can be described by several attributes - quantitative and qualitative (price, make, number of doors, engine, the use of fuel, comfort, etc.). During the process of selection we compare these criteria and thus evaluate the qualitative criteria by making a choice. The aim of the article is to present the methodological framework for the application of conjoint choice analysis while selecting climate change mitigation instruments for Lithuania.

Original languageLithuanian
Pages (from-to)62-69
Number of pages8
JournalEnergetika
Volume5
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Climate change
economic instrument
automobile
energy
sustainable development
Railroad cars
cost
labor market
equity
trade-off
engine
electricity
Sustainable development
innovation
decision
climate change mitigation
attribute
method
market
methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Energy (miscellaneous)
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

Klimato kaitos švelninimo priemoniu̧ parinkimas, taikant daugiakriterinius sprendimu̧ priėmimo metodus. / Mikalauskiene, Asta; Štreimikiene, Dalia.

In: Energetika, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2008, p. 62-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3c1673fd6e9b465d9052e592dc6ebba5,
title = "Klimato kaitos švelninimo priemoniu̧ parinkimas, taikant daugiakriterinius sprendimu̧ priėmimo metodus",
abstract = "The main climate change mitigation tools can be grouped into the following categories: command and control methods, economic instruments, and voluntary instruments. Command and control instruments include technology-or performance-based standards. Economic instruments include tradable emission permits, feed-in tariffs for electricity purchase from renewables and CHP, competitive biding processes, green tradable certificates, and subsidies to consumers who purchase renewable energy equipment or renewable energy. Voluntary instruments include voluntary agreements of energy suppliers and generation disclosure rules. In the following text, we will provide some considerations of the performance of the described instruments with respect to a series of criteria that should be considered in choosing the instruments. These criteria should be based on sustainable development targets and can be expressed by specific indicators of sustainable development. The most important criteria for the selection of climate change mitigation measures are the following: efficiency, impact on energy prices, administrative costs, equity, flexibility, impact on the labour market, impact on technological innovations, security of supply, and emission reduction. Therefore, all these criteria should be taken into account during the selection of climate change mitigation tools. However, it is very difficult to select a single instrument that gives the best outcomes in terms of all these criteria. The choice of the instrument will require some trade-offs among these criteria. The conjoint choice analysis can help investigating how policy makers trade off the criteria when designing a climate change mitigation policy. In conjoint choice analysis techniques, respondents are shown various alternative representations which are described by a set of attributes, and are asked to choose those most preferred. These alternatives differ in the levels taken by two or more attributes. The application of the conjoint choice technique may shed light on the relative importance of criteria in order to suggest the choice of the optimal policy instrument. Some criteria or attributes can be expressed in monetary units, while some cannot be measured and are qualitative, therefore conjoint choice analysis helps to evaluate the marginal costs of some criteria based on a conjoint choice experiment. A simple application of the conjoint choice methodology can be an example of car selection on the market. When we buy a car, we compare the levels taken by the attributes that describe them. A car can be described by several attributes - quantitative and qualitative (price, make, number of doors, engine, the use of fuel, comfort, etc.). During the process of selection we compare these criteria and thus evaluate the qualitative criteria by making a choice. The aim of the article is to present the methodological framework for the application of conjoint choice analysis while selecting climate change mitigation instruments for Lithuania.",
keywords = "Climate change mitigation instruments, Multicriterion decision-aiding tools",
author = "Asta Mikalauskiene and Dalia Štreimikiene",
year = "2008",
language = "Lithuanian",
volume = "5",
pages = "62--69",
journal = "Energetika",
issn = "0235-7208",
publisher = "Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Publishers",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Klimato kaitos švelninimo priemoniu̧ parinkimas, taikant daugiakriterinius sprendimu̧ priėmimo metodus

AU - Mikalauskiene, Asta

AU - Štreimikiene, Dalia

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The main climate change mitigation tools can be grouped into the following categories: command and control methods, economic instruments, and voluntary instruments. Command and control instruments include technology-or performance-based standards. Economic instruments include tradable emission permits, feed-in tariffs for electricity purchase from renewables and CHP, competitive biding processes, green tradable certificates, and subsidies to consumers who purchase renewable energy equipment or renewable energy. Voluntary instruments include voluntary agreements of energy suppliers and generation disclosure rules. In the following text, we will provide some considerations of the performance of the described instruments with respect to a series of criteria that should be considered in choosing the instruments. These criteria should be based on sustainable development targets and can be expressed by specific indicators of sustainable development. The most important criteria for the selection of climate change mitigation measures are the following: efficiency, impact on energy prices, administrative costs, equity, flexibility, impact on the labour market, impact on technological innovations, security of supply, and emission reduction. Therefore, all these criteria should be taken into account during the selection of climate change mitigation tools. However, it is very difficult to select a single instrument that gives the best outcomes in terms of all these criteria. The choice of the instrument will require some trade-offs among these criteria. The conjoint choice analysis can help investigating how policy makers trade off the criteria when designing a climate change mitigation policy. In conjoint choice analysis techniques, respondents are shown various alternative representations which are described by a set of attributes, and are asked to choose those most preferred. These alternatives differ in the levels taken by two or more attributes. The application of the conjoint choice technique may shed light on the relative importance of criteria in order to suggest the choice of the optimal policy instrument. Some criteria or attributes can be expressed in monetary units, while some cannot be measured and are qualitative, therefore conjoint choice analysis helps to evaluate the marginal costs of some criteria based on a conjoint choice experiment. A simple application of the conjoint choice methodology can be an example of car selection on the market. When we buy a car, we compare the levels taken by the attributes that describe them. A car can be described by several attributes - quantitative and qualitative (price, make, number of doors, engine, the use of fuel, comfort, etc.). During the process of selection we compare these criteria and thus evaluate the qualitative criteria by making a choice. The aim of the article is to present the methodological framework for the application of conjoint choice analysis while selecting climate change mitigation instruments for Lithuania.

AB - The main climate change mitigation tools can be grouped into the following categories: command and control methods, economic instruments, and voluntary instruments. Command and control instruments include technology-or performance-based standards. Economic instruments include tradable emission permits, feed-in tariffs for electricity purchase from renewables and CHP, competitive biding processes, green tradable certificates, and subsidies to consumers who purchase renewable energy equipment or renewable energy. Voluntary instruments include voluntary agreements of energy suppliers and generation disclosure rules. In the following text, we will provide some considerations of the performance of the described instruments with respect to a series of criteria that should be considered in choosing the instruments. These criteria should be based on sustainable development targets and can be expressed by specific indicators of sustainable development. The most important criteria for the selection of climate change mitigation measures are the following: efficiency, impact on energy prices, administrative costs, equity, flexibility, impact on the labour market, impact on technological innovations, security of supply, and emission reduction. Therefore, all these criteria should be taken into account during the selection of climate change mitigation tools. However, it is very difficult to select a single instrument that gives the best outcomes in terms of all these criteria. The choice of the instrument will require some trade-offs among these criteria. The conjoint choice analysis can help investigating how policy makers trade off the criteria when designing a climate change mitigation policy. In conjoint choice analysis techniques, respondents are shown various alternative representations which are described by a set of attributes, and are asked to choose those most preferred. These alternatives differ in the levels taken by two or more attributes. The application of the conjoint choice technique may shed light on the relative importance of criteria in order to suggest the choice of the optimal policy instrument. Some criteria or attributes can be expressed in monetary units, while some cannot be measured and are qualitative, therefore conjoint choice analysis helps to evaluate the marginal costs of some criteria based on a conjoint choice experiment. A simple application of the conjoint choice methodology can be an example of car selection on the market. When we buy a car, we compare the levels taken by the attributes that describe them. A car can be described by several attributes - quantitative and qualitative (price, make, number of doors, engine, the use of fuel, comfort, etc.). During the process of selection we compare these criteria and thus evaluate the qualitative criteria by making a choice. The aim of the article is to present the methodological framework for the application of conjoint choice analysis while selecting climate change mitigation instruments for Lithuania.

KW - Climate change mitigation instruments

KW - Multicriterion decision-aiding tools

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48949087778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48949087778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:48949087778

VL - 5

SP - 62

EP - 69

JO - Energetika

JF - Energetika

SN - 0235-7208

IS - 2

ER -