Sociosofija ir praktoteorija

Translated title of the contribution: Sociosophy and practo-theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The article discusses sociosophy as a research that reflects ontological and epistemological assumptions of social science theories. Jointly it introduces practo-theory as an academic attitude, which deals with the challenges of modern philosophy of science by focusing not on scientific knowledge but rather on the content of scientific activity. In this sense, both the philosophy of science and sociosophy as its counterpart can operate or refuse to operate within the practo-theory, since it is not a foundation or primary directive for the philosophy of science, but a voluntary type of research. By referring to particular texts of Alexander Wendt, Theodor Schatzki, Algimantas Valantiejus, Andy Pickering, Bruno Latour, Zygmunt Bauman, and Joseph Rouse I examine what is characteristic to the new antidisciplinary project – practo-theoretical sociosophy, and conclude that social disciplines that reflectively incorporate ontological assumptions into their own research practices will probably lose certain clarity and unambiguousness, but will likely increase methodological transparency and situative efficacy.
Original languageLithuanian
JournalFilosofija Sociologija
Volume27
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

philosophy of science
social science theory
scientific activity
research practice
transparency
knowledge
Philosophy of Science
Ontological

Keywords

  • Social science theories
  • Ontology
  • Epistemology

Cite this

Sociosofija ir praktoteorija. / Juozelis, Evaldas.

In: Filosofija Sociologija, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{40b3a8ace2f74de88b7f453aec41ecfd,
title = "Sociosofija ir praktoteorija",
abstract = "The article discusses sociosophy as a research that reflects ontological and epistemological assumptions of social science theories. Jointly it introduces practo-theory as an academic attitude, which deals with the challenges of modern philosophy of science by focusing not on scientific knowledge but rather on the content of scientific activity. In this sense, both the philosophy of science and sociosophy as its counterpart can operate or refuse to operate within the practo-theory, since it is not a foundation or primary directive for the philosophy of science, but a voluntary type of research. By referring to particular texts of Alexander Wendt, Theodor Schatzki, Algimantas Valantiejus, Andy Pickering, Bruno Latour, Zygmunt Bauman, and Joseph Rouse I examine what is characteristic to the new antidisciplinary project – practo-theoretical sociosophy, and conclude that social disciplines that reflectively incorporate ontological assumptions into their own research practices will probably lose certain clarity and unambiguousness, but will likely increase methodological transparency and situative efficacy.",
keywords = "Social science theories, Ontology, Epistemology",
author = "Evaldas Juozelis",
year = "2016",
language = "Lithuanian",
volume = "27",
journal = "Filosofija Sociologija",
issn = "0235-7186",
publisher = "Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Publishers",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sociosofija ir praktoteorija

AU - Juozelis, Evaldas

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The article discusses sociosophy as a research that reflects ontological and epistemological assumptions of social science theories. Jointly it introduces practo-theory as an academic attitude, which deals with the challenges of modern philosophy of science by focusing not on scientific knowledge but rather on the content of scientific activity. In this sense, both the philosophy of science and sociosophy as its counterpart can operate or refuse to operate within the practo-theory, since it is not a foundation or primary directive for the philosophy of science, but a voluntary type of research. By referring to particular texts of Alexander Wendt, Theodor Schatzki, Algimantas Valantiejus, Andy Pickering, Bruno Latour, Zygmunt Bauman, and Joseph Rouse I examine what is characteristic to the new antidisciplinary project – practo-theoretical sociosophy, and conclude that social disciplines that reflectively incorporate ontological assumptions into their own research practices will probably lose certain clarity and unambiguousness, but will likely increase methodological transparency and situative efficacy.

AB - The article discusses sociosophy as a research that reflects ontological and epistemological assumptions of social science theories. Jointly it introduces practo-theory as an academic attitude, which deals with the challenges of modern philosophy of science by focusing not on scientific knowledge but rather on the content of scientific activity. In this sense, both the philosophy of science and sociosophy as its counterpart can operate or refuse to operate within the practo-theory, since it is not a foundation or primary directive for the philosophy of science, but a voluntary type of research. By referring to particular texts of Alexander Wendt, Theodor Schatzki, Algimantas Valantiejus, Andy Pickering, Bruno Latour, Zygmunt Bauman, and Joseph Rouse I examine what is characteristic to the new antidisciplinary project – practo-theoretical sociosophy, and conclude that social disciplines that reflectively incorporate ontological assumptions into their own research practices will probably lose certain clarity and unambiguousness, but will likely increase methodological transparency and situative efficacy.

KW - Social science theories

KW - Ontology

KW - Epistemology

M3 - Article

VL - 27

JO - Filosofija Sociologija

JF - Filosofija Sociologija

SN - 0235-7186

IS - 3

ER -