Soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling

History and future directions

Eric C. Brevik, Costanza Calzolari, Bradley A. Miller, Paulo Pereira, Cezary Kabala, Andreas Baumgarten, Antonio Jordán

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

106 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling have been important drivers in the advancement of our understanding of soil from the earliest days of the scientific study of soils. Soil maps were desirable for purposes of land valuation for taxation, agronomic planning, and even in military operations. Soil mapping required classification systems that would allow communication of mapped information, classification systems required understanding of the soil system, and gaining that understanding included the creation of soil models. Therefore, advancement in one of these highly interrelated areas tended to lead to corresponding advances in the others, and these relationships persist into the modern era. Although many advances in our understanding of the soil system have been made since the late 1800s, when soil science blossomed into a scientific discipline in its own right, there are still many unanswered questions and additional needs in soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling. New technologies including GPS, GIS, remote sensing, on-site geophysical instrumentation (EMI, GPR, PXRF, etc.), and the development of statistical and geostatistical techniques have greatly increased our ability to collect, analyze, and predict spatial information related to soils, but linking all of this new information to soil properties and processes can still be a challenge and enhanced pedologic models are needed. The expansion of the use of soil knowledge to address issues beyond agronomic production, such as land use planning, environmental concerns, food security, energy security, water security, and human health, to name a few, requires new ways to communicate what we know about the soils we map as well as bringing forth research questions that were not widely considered in earlier soils studies. At present this information is communicated using dozens of national soil classification systems as well as WRB, but a more universal soil classification system would facilitate international communication of soils information. There are still many significant needs in the area of soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling going into the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)256-274
Number of pages19
JournalGeoderma
Volume264
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 15 2016

Fingerprint

soil surveys
history
modeling
soil
soil classification
land use planning
soil science
instrumentation
taxes
communication (human)
communication
food security
remote sensing
human health
soil properties
planning
ground penetrating radar
valuation
soil property
energy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Soil Science

Cite this

Brevik, E. C., Calzolari, C., Miller, B. A., Pereira, P., Kabala, C., Baumgarten, A., & Jordán, A. (2016). Soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling: History and future directions. Geoderma, 264, 256-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.05.017

Soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling : History and future directions. / Brevik, Eric C.; Calzolari, Costanza; Miller, Bradley A.; Pereira, Paulo; Kabala, Cezary; Baumgarten, Andreas; Jordán, Antonio.

In: Geoderma, Vol. 264, 15.02.2016, p. 256-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brevik, EC, Calzolari, C, Miller, BA, Pereira, P, Kabala, C, Baumgarten, A & Jordán, A 2016, 'Soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling: History and future directions', Geoderma, vol. 264, pp. 256-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.05.017
Brevik, Eric C. ; Calzolari, Costanza ; Miller, Bradley A. ; Pereira, Paulo ; Kabala, Cezary ; Baumgarten, Andreas ; Jordán, Antonio. / Soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling : History and future directions. In: Geoderma. 2016 ; Vol. 264. pp. 256-274.
@article{b804b22174b84669a261de24d4c7cc54,
title = "Soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling: History and future directions",
abstract = "Soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling have been important drivers in the advancement of our understanding of soil from the earliest days of the scientific study of soils. Soil maps were desirable for purposes of land valuation for taxation, agronomic planning, and even in military operations. Soil mapping required classification systems that would allow communication of mapped information, classification systems required understanding of the soil system, and gaining that understanding included the creation of soil models. Therefore, advancement in one of these highly interrelated areas tended to lead to corresponding advances in the others, and these relationships persist into the modern era. Although many advances in our understanding of the soil system have been made since the late 1800s, when soil science blossomed into a scientific discipline in its own right, there are still many unanswered questions and additional needs in soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling. New technologies including GPS, GIS, remote sensing, on-site geophysical instrumentation (EMI, GPR, PXRF, etc.), and the development of statistical and geostatistical techniques have greatly increased our ability to collect, analyze, and predict spatial information related to soils, but linking all of this new information to soil properties and processes can still be a challenge and enhanced pedologic models are needed. The expansion of the use of soil knowledge to address issues beyond agronomic production, such as land use planning, environmental concerns, food security, energy security, water security, and human health, to name a few, requires new ways to communicate what we know about the soils we map as well as bringing forth research questions that were not widely considered in earlier soils studies. At present this information is communicated using dozens of national soil classification systems as well as WRB, but a more universal soil classification system would facilitate international communication of soils information. There are still many significant needs in the area of soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling going into the future.",
author = "Brevik, {Eric C.} and Costanza Calzolari and Miller, {Bradley A.} and Paulo Pereira and Cezary Kabala and Andreas Baumgarten and Antonio Jord{\'a}n",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.05.017",
language = "English",
volume = "264",
pages = "256--274",
journal = "Geoderma",
issn = "0016-7061",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling

T2 - History and future directions

AU - Brevik, Eric C.

AU - Calzolari, Costanza

AU - Miller, Bradley A.

AU - Pereira, Paulo

AU - Kabala, Cezary

AU - Baumgarten, Andreas

AU - Jordán, Antonio

PY - 2016/2/15

Y1 - 2016/2/15

N2 - Soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling have been important drivers in the advancement of our understanding of soil from the earliest days of the scientific study of soils. Soil maps were desirable for purposes of land valuation for taxation, agronomic planning, and even in military operations. Soil mapping required classification systems that would allow communication of mapped information, classification systems required understanding of the soil system, and gaining that understanding included the creation of soil models. Therefore, advancement in one of these highly interrelated areas tended to lead to corresponding advances in the others, and these relationships persist into the modern era. Although many advances in our understanding of the soil system have been made since the late 1800s, when soil science blossomed into a scientific discipline in its own right, there are still many unanswered questions and additional needs in soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling. New technologies including GPS, GIS, remote sensing, on-site geophysical instrumentation (EMI, GPR, PXRF, etc.), and the development of statistical and geostatistical techniques have greatly increased our ability to collect, analyze, and predict spatial information related to soils, but linking all of this new information to soil properties and processes can still be a challenge and enhanced pedologic models are needed. The expansion of the use of soil knowledge to address issues beyond agronomic production, such as land use planning, environmental concerns, food security, energy security, water security, and human health, to name a few, requires new ways to communicate what we know about the soils we map as well as bringing forth research questions that were not widely considered in earlier soils studies. At present this information is communicated using dozens of national soil classification systems as well as WRB, but a more universal soil classification system would facilitate international communication of soils information. There are still many significant needs in the area of soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling going into the future.

AB - Soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling have been important drivers in the advancement of our understanding of soil from the earliest days of the scientific study of soils. Soil maps were desirable for purposes of land valuation for taxation, agronomic planning, and even in military operations. Soil mapping required classification systems that would allow communication of mapped information, classification systems required understanding of the soil system, and gaining that understanding included the creation of soil models. Therefore, advancement in one of these highly interrelated areas tended to lead to corresponding advances in the others, and these relationships persist into the modern era. Although many advances in our understanding of the soil system have been made since the late 1800s, when soil science blossomed into a scientific discipline in its own right, there are still many unanswered questions and additional needs in soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling. New technologies including GPS, GIS, remote sensing, on-site geophysical instrumentation (EMI, GPR, PXRF, etc.), and the development of statistical and geostatistical techniques have greatly increased our ability to collect, analyze, and predict spatial information related to soils, but linking all of this new information to soil properties and processes can still be a challenge and enhanced pedologic models are needed. The expansion of the use of soil knowledge to address issues beyond agronomic production, such as land use planning, environmental concerns, food security, energy security, water security, and human health, to name a few, requires new ways to communicate what we know about the soils we map as well as bringing forth research questions that were not widely considered in earlier soils studies. At present this information is communicated using dozens of national soil classification systems as well as WRB, but a more universal soil classification system would facilitate international communication of soils information. There are still many significant needs in the area of soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling going into the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949106662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949106662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.05.017

DO - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.05.017

M3 - Article

VL - 264

SP - 256

EP - 274

JO - Geoderma

JF - Geoderma

SN - 0016-7061

ER -