Sustainability assessment studies of recreational buildings

Saulius Raslanas, Andrius Stasiukynas, Edita Jurgelaityte

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sustainability Assessment Systems (SAS) quantify the value of sustainability the buildings have become popular not only in planning a sustainable real estate development, but also in scientific research. The main weakness of these tools is a lack of financial aspects, such as Building life-cycle cost analysis (LCC); inflexibility, complexity, unsound weights of the system and natural resources and environmental evaluation criteria dominance over the social and economic problems. Given this background, recommended Lithuania's recreational building sustainability assessment system is a modified BREEAM system which is complemented with social and economic criteria. Their importance is determined using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. Estimated Druskininkai "Snow Arena" sustainability's value according to the modified system is 66.54%, which equals "very good" result. According to BREEAM New Construction 2011 scheme 57.80% score was reached, which also corresponded to "very good" rating. The higher rating in the modified system was due to increased social and economic criteria weights, as well as the fact that the arena well satisfied these criteria.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProcedia Engineering
Pages929-937
Number of pages9
Volume57
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes
Event11th International Scientific Conference on Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, MBMST 2013 - Vilnius, Lithuania
Duration: May 16 2013May 17 2013

Other

Other11th International Scientific Conference on Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, MBMST 2013
CountryLithuania
CityVilnius
Period5/16/135/17/13

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
Economics
Analytic hierarchy process
Natural resources
Snow
Life cycle
Planning
Costs

Keywords

  • Druskininkai Snow Arena
  • Modified BREEAM system
  • Recreational buildings
  • Sustainability Assessment System (SAS)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Raslanas, S., Stasiukynas, A., & Jurgelaityte, E. (2013). Sustainability assessment studies of recreational buildings. In Procedia Engineering (Vol. 57, pp. 929-937) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.118

Sustainability assessment studies of recreational buildings. / Raslanas, Saulius; Stasiukynas, Andrius; Jurgelaityte, Edita.

Procedia Engineering. Vol. 57 2013. p. 929-937.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Raslanas, S, Stasiukynas, A & Jurgelaityte, E 2013, Sustainability assessment studies of recreational buildings. in Procedia Engineering. vol. 57, pp. 929-937, 11th International Scientific Conference on Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, MBMST 2013, Vilnius, Lithuania, 5/16/13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.118
Raslanas S, Stasiukynas A, Jurgelaityte E. Sustainability assessment studies of recreational buildings. In Procedia Engineering. Vol. 57. 2013. p. 929-937 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.118
Raslanas, Saulius ; Stasiukynas, Andrius ; Jurgelaityte, Edita. / Sustainability assessment studies of recreational buildings. Procedia Engineering. Vol. 57 2013. pp. 929-937
@inproceedings{d93ae29b4aea47138a2bb9f417bc96e3,
title = "Sustainability assessment studies of recreational buildings",
abstract = "Sustainability Assessment Systems (SAS) quantify the value of sustainability the buildings have become popular not only in planning a sustainable real estate development, but also in scientific research. The main weakness of these tools is a lack of financial aspects, such as Building life-cycle cost analysis (LCC); inflexibility, complexity, unsound weights of the system and natural resources and environmental evaluation criteria dominance over the social and economic problems. Given this background, recommended Lithuania's recreational building sustainability assessment system is a modified BREEAM system which is complemented with social and economic criteria. Their importance is determined using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. Estimated Druskininkai {"}Snow Arena{"} sustainability's value according to the modified system is 66.54{\%}, which equals {"}very good{"} result. According to BREEAM New Construction 2011 scheme 57.80{\%} score was reached, which also corresponded to {"}very good{"} rating. The higher rating in the modified system was due to increased social and economic criteria weights, as well as the fact that the arena well satisfied these criteria.",
keywords = "Druskininkai Snow Arena, Modified BREEAM system, Recreational buildings, Sustainability Assessment System (SAS)",
author = "Saulius Raslanas and Andrius Stasiukynas and Edita Jurgelaityte",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.118",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "929--937",
booktitle = "Procedia Engineering",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Sustainability assessment studies of recreational buildings

AU - Raslanas, Saulius

AU - Stasiukynas, Andrius

AU - Jurgelaityte, Edita

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Sustainability Assessment Systems (SAS) quantify the value of sustainability the buildings have become popular not only in planning a sustainable real estate development, but also in scientific research. The main weakness of these tools is a lack of financial aspects, such as Building life-cycle cost analysis (LCC); inflexibility, complexity, unsound weights of the system and natural resources and environmental evaluation criteria dominance over the social and economic problems. Given this background, recommended Lithuania's recreational building sustainability assessment system is a modified BREEAM system which is complemented with social and economic criteria. Their importance is determined using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. Estimated Druskininkai "Snow Arena" sustainability's value according to the modified system is 66.54%, which equals "very good" result. According to BREEAM New Construction 2011 scheme 57.80% score was reached, which also corresponded to "very good" rating. The higher rating in the modified system was due to increased social and economic criteria weights, as well as the fact that the arena well satisfied these criteria.

AB - Sustainability Assessment Systems (SAS) quantify the value of sustainability the buildings have become popular not only in planning a sustainable real estate development, but also in scientific research. The main weakness of these tools is a lack of financial aspects, such as Building life-cycle cost analysis (LCC); inflexibility, complexity, unsound weights of the system and natural resources and environmental evaluation criteria dominance over the social and economic problems. Given this background, recommended Lithuania's recreational building sustainability assessment system is a modified BREEAM system which is complemented with social and economic criteria. Their importance is determined using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. Estimated Druskininkai "Snow Arena" sustainability's value according to the modified system is 66.54%, which equals "very good" result. According to BREEAM New Construction 2011 scheme 57.80% score was reached, which also corresponded to "very good" rating. The higher rating in the modified system was due to increased social and economic criteria weights, as well as the fact that the arena well satisfied these criteria.

KW - Druskininkai Snow Arena

KW - Modified BREEAM system

KW - Recreational buildings

KW - Sustainability Assessment System (SAS)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891695577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891695577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.118

DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.118

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 57

SP - 929

EP - 937

BT - Procedia Engineering

ER -