Systems thinking as a platform for leadership performance in a complex world

Tomas Palaima, Aelita Skaržauskiene

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Effective decision making and learning in a world of growing dynamic complexity requires leaders to become systems thinkers - to develop tools to understand the structures of complex systems. The paper aims to clarify the relationship between systems thinking and leadership performance. The relevance of systems thinking as a competence was disclosed in the context of leadership in the complex world. Design/methodology/approach: The paper followed a quantitative research approach. First, exploratory factor analysis was employed to assess dimensionality of scales. Second, relationships between variables were explored using Spearman's correlation. Third, multiple linear regression was run to test the hypothesized model of relationships. The total sample of 201 consists of subsamples in two industries: retail trade (103 respondents) and manufacturing (98 respondents). Findings: Based on the analysis and synthesis of the scientific literature, a conceptual model of relationship between intelligence competencies (such as systems thinking) and leadership performance is developed. The theoretical model is supported by empirical evidence from the two industries perspectives: the paper compares the impact of systems thinking on leadership performance in manufacturing and retail trade enterprises. Correlational and regression analyses revealed that systems thinking was associated with higher leadership performance. Research limitations/implications: Because of the chosen research approach, the research results may lack generalizability. First, the model was tested empirically only in two industries: in retail trade and in manufacturing. Second, the sample of this research was limited only to national level, therefore there is no possibility to compare results across different countries. In order to generalize the research findings, further research should include more companies from different industries. Practical implications: The paper discloses the benefits of systems thinking in organization and includes implications for the development of systems thinking and other leadership competencies. Originality/value: This paper establishes a link between systems thinking and leadership performance. Theoretical insights that systems thinking is most important dealing with conceptual strategic problems of an organization were confirmed empirically.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)330-355
Number of pages26
JournalBaltic Journal of Management
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Industry
Factor analysis
Systems thinking
Linear regression
Large scale systems
Decision making
Manufacturing
Retail trade

Keywords

  • Competences
  • Complexity theory
  • Emotional intelligence
  • Leadership
  • Thinking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Marketing
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Systems thinking as a platform for leadership performance in a complex world. / Palaima, Tomas; Skaržauskiene, Aelita.

In: Baltic Journal of Management, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2010, p. 330-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{271eed082faf4f33a045c16d44868bb8,
title = "Systems thinking as a platform for leadership performance in a complex world",
abstract = "Purpose: Effective decision making and learning in a world of growing dynamic complexity requires leaders to become systems thinkers - to develop tools to understand the structures of complex systems. The paper aims to clarify the relationship between systems thinking and leadership performance. The relevance of systems thinking as a competence was disclosed in the context of leadership in the complex world. Design/methodology/approach: The paper followed a quantitative research approach. First, exploratory factor analysis was employed to assess dimensionality of scales. Second, relationships between variables were explored using Spearman's correlation. Third, multiple linear regression was run to test the hypothesized model of relationships. The total sample of 201 consists of subsamples in two industries: retail trade (103 respondents) and manufacturing (98 respondents). Findings: Based on the analysis and synthesis of the scientific literature, a conceptual model of relationship between intelligence competencies (such as systems thinking) and leadership performance is developed. The theoretical model is supported by empirical evidence from the two industries perspectives: the paper compares the impact of systems thinking on leadership performance in manufacturing and retail trade enterprises. Correlational and regression analyses revealed that systems thinking was associated with higher leadership performance. Research limitations/implications: Because of the chosen research approach, the research results may lack generalizability. First, the model was tested empirically only in two industries: in retail trade and in manufacturing. Second, the sample of this research was limited only to national level, therefore there is no possibility to compare results across different countries. In order to generalize the research findings, further research should include more companies from different industries. Practical implications: The paper discloses the benefits of systems thinking in organization and includes implications for the development of systems thinking and other leadership competencies. Originality/value: This paper establishes a link between systems thinking and leadership performance. Theoretical insights that systems thinking is most important dealing with conceptual strategic problems of an organization were confirmed empirically.",
keywords = "Competences, Complexity theory, Emotional intelligence, Leadership, Thinking",
author = "Tomas Palaima and Aelita Skaržauskiene",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1108/17465261011079749",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "330--355",
journal = "Baltic Journal of Management",
issn = "1746-5265",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systems thinking as a platform for leadership performance in a complex world

AU - Palaima, Tomas

AU - Skaržauskiene, Aelita

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Purpose: Effective decision making and learning in a world of growing dynamic complexity requires leaders to become systems thinkers - to develop tools to understand the structures of complex systems. The paper aims to clarify the relationship between systems thinking and leadership performance. The relevance of systems thinking as a competence was disclosed in the context of leadership in the complex world. Design/methodology/approach: The paper followed a quantitative research approach. First, exploratory factor analysis was employed to assess dimensionality of scales. Second, relationships between variables were explored using Spearman's correlation. Third, multiple linear regression was run to test the hypothesized model of relationships. The total sample of 201 consists of subsamples in two industries: retail trade (103 respondents) and manufacturing (98 respondents). Findings: Based on the analysis and synthesis of the scientific literature, a conceptual model of relationship between intelligence competencies (such as systems thinking) and leadership performance is developed. The theoretical model is supported by empirical evidence from the two industries perspectives: the paper compares the impact of systems thinking on leadership performance in manufacturing and retail trade enterprises. Correlational and regression analyses revealed that systems thinking was associated with higher leadership performance. Research limitations/implications: Because of the chosen research approach, the research results may lack generalizability. First, the model was tested empirically only in two industries: in retail trade and in manufacturing. Second, the sample of this research was limited only to national level, therefore there is no possibility to compare results across different countries. In order to generalize the research findings, further research should include more companies from different industries. Practical implications: The paper discloses the benefits of systems thinking in organization and includes implications for the development of systems thinking and other leadership competencies. Originality/value: This paper establishes a link between systems thinking and leadership performance. Theoretical insights that systems thinking is most important dealing with conceptual strategic problems of an organization were confirmed empirically.

AB - Purpose: Effective decision making and learning in a world of growing dynamic complexity requires leaders to become systems thinkers - to develop tools to understand the structures of complex systems. The paper aims to clarify the relationship between systems thinking and leadership performance. The relevance of systems thinking as a competence was disclosed in the context of leadership in the complex world. Design/methodology/approach: The paper followed a quantitative research approach. First, exploratory factor analysis was employed to assess dimensionality of scales. Second, relationships between variables were explored using Spearman's correlation. Third, multiple linear regression was run to test the hypothesized model of relationships. The total sample of 201 consists of subsamples in two industries: retail trade (103 respondents) and manufacturing (98 respondents). Findings: Based on the analysis and synthesis of the scientific literature, a conceptual model of relationship between intelligence competencies (such as systems thinking) and leadership performance is developed. The theoretical model is supported by empirical evidence from the two industries perspectives: the paper compares the impact of systems thinking on leadership performance in manufacturing and retail trade enterprises. Correlational and regression analyses revealed that systems thinking was associated with higher leadership performance. Research limitations/implications: Because of the chosen research approach, the research results may lack generalizability. First, the model was tested empirically only in two industries: in retail trade and in manufacturing. Second, the sample of this research was limited only to national level, therefore there is no possibility to compare results across different countries. In order to generalize the research findings, further research should include more companies from different industries. Practical implications: The paper discloses the benefits of systems thinking in organization and includes implications for the development of systems thinking and other leadership competencies. Originality/value: This paper establishes a link between systems thinking and leadership performance. Theoretical insights that systems thinking is most important dealing with conceptual strategic problems of an organization were confirmed empirically.

KW - Competences

KW - Complexity theory

KW - Emotional intelligence

KW - Leadership

KW - Thinking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957153126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957153126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/17465261011079749

DO - 10.1108/17465261011079749

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 330

EP - 355

JO - Baltic Journal of Management

JF - Baltic Journal of Management

SN - 1746-5265

IS - 3

ER -