Teisinio diskurso dialektika

Translated title of the contribution: The dialectic of the legal discourse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The social origins of law are an objective factor, which encourages experts and laymen alike to engage in a legal discourse. The relevance of legal regulation puts the society under an illusion that legal discourse is easy and everybody could be a part of it by virtue of using common sense alone. Legal discourse, however, is not less complex than any other type of research discourse. At its heart lies an effort to peer into the problem in a systematic manner. Apart from its relation to other fields, legal discourse is heavily dominated by the legal substance. Legal discourse is characterized by the usage of a unique and specific language filled with legal definitions, special terminology and reasoned references to specific theories. Didactics, i.e. the knowledge of both legal regulation and doctrine, are building blocks of the quality of a legal discourse. Efforts to diminish the importance of didactics in a 'legal' discourse lead to a simulated science (J. Boudrillard). This leads to disinformation rather that information for the society. Simulation of a legal discourse makes law appear as something intangible and nearly metaphysical. Such discourses decrease the value of law in the society and the rule of law becomes a utopia rather than a reality of a democratic society.

Original languageLithuanian
Pages (from-to)16-22
Number of pages7
JournalLogos
Issue number67
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

dialectics
discourse
didactics
Law
disinformation
Legal Discourse
Dialectics
regulation
utopia
constitutional state
technical language
doctrine
expert
simulation
Society
language
science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

Teisinio diskurso dialektika. / Mesonis, Gediminas.

In: Logos, No. 67, 2011, p. 16-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mesonis, G 2011, 'Teisinio diskurso dialektika', Logos, no. 67, pp. 16-22.
Mesonis, Gediminas. / Teisinio diskurso dialektika. In: Logos. 2011 ; No. 67. pp. 16-22.
@article{122ff88d6aa7495b98b25c4299bda9a1,
title = "Teisinio diskurso dialektika",
abstract = "The social origins of law are an objective factor, which encourages experts and laymen alike to engage in a legal discourse. The relevance of legal regulation puts the society under an illusion that legal discourse is easy and everybody could be a part of it by virtue of using common sense alone. Legal discourse, however, is not less complex than any other type of research discourse. At its heart lies an effort to peer into the problem in a systematic manner. Apart from its relation to other fields, legal discourse is heavily dominated by the legal substance. Legal discourse is characterized by the usage of a unique and specific language filled with legal definitions, special terminology and reasoned references to specific theories. Didactics, i.e. the knowledge of both legal regulation and doctrine, are building blocks of the quality of a legal discourse. Efforts to diminish the importance of didactics in a 'legal' discourse lead to a simulated science (J. Boudrillard). This leads to disinformation rather that information for the society. Simulation of a legal discourse makes law appear as something intangible and nearly metaphysical. Such discourses decrease the value of law in the society and the rule of law becomes a utopia rather than a reality of a democratic society.",
keywords = "Dialectic, Didactics, Interpretation, Language, Law, Legal discourse, Simulation",
author = "Gediminas Mesonis",
year = "2011",
language = "Lithuanian",
pages = "16--22",
journal = "Logos (Lithuania)",
issn = "0868-7692",
publisher = "Visuomenine organizacija {"}LOGOS{"}",
number = "67",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teisinio diskurso dialektika

AU - Mesonis, Gediminas

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The social origins of law are an objective factor, which encourages experts and laymen alike to engage in a legal discourse. The relevance of legal regulation puts the society under an illusion that legal discourse is easy and everybody could be a part of it by virtue of using common sense alone. Legal discourse, however, is not less complex than any other type of research discourse. At its heart lies an effort to peer into the problem in a systematic manner. Apart from its relation to other fields, legal discourse is heavily dominated by the legal substance. Legal discourse is characterized by the usage of a unique and specific language filled with legal definitions, special terminology and reasoned references to specific theories. Didactics, i.e. the knowledge of both legal regulation and doctrine, are building blocks of the quality of a legal discourse. Efforts to diminish the importance of didactics in a 'legal' discourse lead to a simulated science (J. Boudrillard). This leads to disinformation rather that information for the society. Simulation of a legal discourse makes law appear as something intangible and nearly metaphysical. Such discourses decrease the value of law in the society and the rule of law becomes a utopia rather than a reality of a democratic society.

AB - The social origins of law are an objective factor, which encourages experts and laymen alike to engage in a legal discourse. The relevance of legal regulation puts the society under an illusion that legal discourse is easy and everybody could be a part of it by virtue of using common sense alone. Legal discourse, however, is not less complex than any other type of research discourse. At its heart lies an effort to peer into the problem in a systematic manner. Apart from its relation to other fields, legal discourse is heavily dominated by the legal substance. Legal discourse is characterized by the usage of a unique and specific language filled with legal definitions, special terminology and reasoned references to specific theories. Didactics, i.e. the knowledge of both legal regulation and doctrine, are building blocks of the quality of a legal discourse. Efforts to diminish the importance of didactics in a 'legal' discourse lead to a simulated science (J. Boudrillard). This leads to disinformation rather that information for the society. Simulation of a legal discourse makes law appear as something intangible and nearly metaphysical. Such discourses decrease the value of law in the society and the rule of law becomes a utopia rather than a reality of a democratic society.

KW - Dialectic

KW - Didactics

KW - Interpretation

KW - Language

KW - Law

KW - Legal discourse

KW - Simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053654787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053654787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80053654787

SP - 16

EP - 22

JO - Logos (Lithuania)

JF - Logos (Lithuania)

SN - 0868-7692

IS - 67

ER -