Socialinės filosofijos disciplinos fragmentai lietuvoje

Translated title of the contribution: The fragments of the social philosophy as a discipline in Lithuania

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

An article analyzes social philosophy as an independent philosophical discipline in Lithuania. First, we consider the reasons why the creation of the field of social philosophy was so unpopular. Then we demonstrate the main trends and feature the analysis of the problems in the field of social philosophy. It appears that all the main authors criticize a positivist and pragmatic approach in the methodology of social researches. The basic problems of social philosophy are analyzed with an attempt to avoid a dilemma of the priority of individual against the traditional forms of social life. Many Lithuanian political philosophers criticize the most radical attempts to deconstruct social traditions by the postmodern relativity of values, the concepts of a playful change of individual identity, and by an intention to blur a private and a public milieu in a social space.

Original languageLithuanian
Pages (from-to)35-42
Number of pages8
JournalLogos (Lithuania)
Issue number71
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

social philosophy
Lithuania
social space
social research
pragmatics
Social philosophy
methodology
trend
Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

Socialinės filosofijos disciplinos fragmentai lietuvoje. / Vabalaite, Ruta Marija.

In: Logos (Lithuania), No. 71, 2012, p. 35-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1223df3b04e34053bab1414c5c9cddf2,
title = "Socialinės filosofijos disciplinos fragmentai lietuvoje",
abstract = "An article analyzes social philosophy as an independent philosophical discipline in Lithuania. First, we consider the reasons why the creation of the field of social philosophy was so unpopular. Then we demonstrate the main trends and feature the analysis of the problems in the field of social philosophy. It appears that all the main authors criticize a positivist and pragmatic approach in the methodology of social researches. The basic problems of social philosophy are analyzed with an attempt to avoid a dilemma of the priority of individual against the traditional forms of social life. Many Lithuanian political philosophers criticize the most radical attempts to deconstruct social traditions by the postmodern relativity of values, the concepts of a playful change of individual identity, and by an intention to blur a private and a public milieu in a social space.",
keywords = "Individualism, Philosophy of culture, Political philosophy, Social theory, Tradition, Value",
author = "Vabalaite, {Ruta Marija}",
year = "2012",
language = "Lithuanian",
pages = "35--42",
journal = "Logos (Lithuania)",
issn = "0868-7692",
publisher = "Visuomenine organizacija {"}LOGOS{"}",
number = "71",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socialinės filosofijos disciplinos fragmentai lietuvoje

AU - Vabalaite, Ruta Marija

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - An article analyzes social philosophy as an independent philosophical discipline in Lithuania. First, we consider the reasons why the creation of the field of social philosophy was so unpopular. Then we demonstrate the main trends and feature the analysis of the problems in the field of social philosophy. It appears that all the main authors criticize a positivist and pragmatic approach in the methodology of social researches. The basic problems of social philosophy are analyzed with an attempt to avoid a dilemma of the priority of individual against the traditional forms of social life. Many Lithuanian political philosophers criticize the most radical attempts to deconstruct social traditions by the postmodern relativity of values, the concepts of a playful change of individual identity, and by an intention to blur a private and a public milieu in a social space.

AB - An article analyzes social philosophy as an independent philosophical discipline in Lithuania. First, we consider the reasons why the creation of the field of social philosophy was so unpopular. Then we demonstrate the main trends and feature the analysis of the problems in the field of social philosophy. It appears that all the main authors criticize a positivist and pragmatic approach in the methodology of social researches. The basic problems of social philosophy are analyzed with an attempt to avoid a dilemma of the priority of individual against the traditional forms of social life. Many Lithuanian political philosophers criticize the most radical attempts to deconstruct social traditions by the postmodern relativity of values, the concepts of a playful change of individual identity, and by an intention to blur a private and a public milieu in a social space.

KW - Individualism

KW - Philosophy of culture

KW - Political philosophy

KW - Social theory

KW - Tradition

KW - Value

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870008017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870008017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

SP - 35

EP - 42

JO - Logos (Lithuania)

JF - Logos (Lithuania)

SN - 0868-7692

IS - 71

ER -