Tolerance boundaries and cultural egalitarianism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The significance of formal criteria which could help to sort out the problem of tolerance paradox has emerged in the background of cultural egalitarianism. Alas, such criteria have not been established so far. The conviction that the problem of tolerance is significant just in the context of social and political discourse might be questioned due to the fact that this attitude did not help to tackle this problem throughout the last centuries. The paper aims to show that the problem of tolerance can be solved taking into account systemic attitude and synergetic insights. The current study into the literature on tolerance concludes that the formal criterion, which defines the tolerance boundaries in the most general sense, is considered to be such deviations from the standard (as ideal parameters of social system) when tolerance can function normally (stably). Cultural egalitarianism, which requires equalizing the rights of the majority and the minorities facing discrimination, impinges on the ratio of necessary diversity, and thus has to be questioned.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-79
JournalLimes
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

egalitarianism
tolerance
synergetics
social system
discrimination
minority
discourse

Keywords

  • Egalitarianism
  • Constant of requisite disharmony
  • Tolerance boundaries

Cite this

Tolerance boundaries and cultural egalitarianism. / Kanisauskas, Saulius.

In: Limes, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2010, p. 67-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0d40dc0017ac48ed9c8f2c1e2e4d0c47,
title = "Tolerance boundaries and cultural egalitarianism",
abstract = "The significance of formal criteria which could help to sort out the problem of tolerance paradox has emerged in the background of cultural egalitarianism. Alas, such criteria have not been established so far. The conviction that the problem of tolerance is significant just in the context of social and political discourse might be questioned due to the fact that this attitude did not help to tackle this problem throughout the last centuries. The paper aims to show that the problem of tolerance can be solved taking into account systemic attitude and synergetic insights. The current study into the literature on tolerance concludes that the formal criterion, which defines the tolerance boundaries in the most general sense, is considered to be such deviations from the standard (as ideal parameters of social system) when tolerance can function normally (stably). Cultural egalitarianism, which requires equalizing the rights of the majority and the minorities facing discrimination, impinges on the ratio of necessary diversity, and thus has to be questioned.",
keywords = "Egalitarianism , Constant of requisite disharmony , Tolerance boundaries",
author = "Saulius Kanisauskas",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.3846/limes.2010.07",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "67--79",
journal = "Limes",
issn = "2029-0187",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tolerance boundaries and cultural egalitarianism

AU - Kanisauskas, Saulius

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The significance of formal criteria which could help to sort out the problem of tolerance paradox has emerged in the background of cultural egalitarianism. Alas, such criteria have not been established so far. The conviction that the problem of tolerance is significant just in the context of social and political discourse might be questioned due to the fact that this attitude did not help to tackle this problem throughout the last centuries. The paper aims to show that the problem of tolerance can be solved taking into account systemic attitude and synergetic insights. The current study into the literature on tolerance concludes that the formal criterion, which defines the tolerance boundaries in the most general sense, is considered to be such deviations from the standard (as ideal parameters of social system) when tolerance can function normally (stably). Cultural egalitarianism, which requires equalizing the rights of the majority and the minorities facing discrimination, impinges on the ratio of necessary diversity, and thus has to be questioned.

AB - The significance of formal criteria which could help to sort out the problem of tolerance paradox has emerged in the background of cultural egalitarianism. Alas, such criteria have not been established so far. The conviction that the problem of tolerance is significant just in the context of social and political discourse might be questioned due to the fact that this attitude did not help to tackle this problem throughout the last centuries. The paper aims to show that the problem of tolerance can be solved taking into account systemic attitude and synergetic insights. The current study into the literature on tolerance concludes that the formal criterion, which defines the tolerance boundaries in the most general sense, is considered to be such deviations from the standard (as ideal parameters of social system) when tolerance can function normally (stably). Cultural egalitarianism, which requires equalizing the rights of the majority and the minorities facing discrimination, impinges on the ratio of necessary diversity, and thus has to be questioned.

KW - Egalitarianism

KW - Constant of requisite disharmony

KW - Tolerance boundaries

U2 - 10.3846/limes.2010.07

DO - 10.3846/limes.2010.07

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 67

EP - 79

JO - Limes

JF - Limes

SN - 2029-0187

IS - 1

ER -