Tolerancijos ribos ir kulturinis egalitarizmas

Translated title of the contribution: Tolerance boundaries and cultural egalitarianism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The significance of formal criteria which could help to sort out the problem of tolerance paradox has emerged in the background of cultural egalitarianism. Alas, such criteria have not been established so far. The conviction that the problem of tolerance is significant just in the context of social and political discourse might be questioned due to the fact that this attitude did not help to tackle this problem throughout the last centuries. The paper aims to show that the problem of tolerance can be solved taking into account systemic attitude and synergetic insights. The current study into the literature on tolerance con- cludes that the formal criterion, which defines the tolerance boundaries in the most general sense, is considered to be such deviations from the standard (as ideal parameters of social system) when tolerance can function normally (sta- bly). Cultural egalitarianism, which requires equalizing the rights of the major- ity and the minorities facing discrimination, impinges on the ratio of necessary diversity, and thus has to be questioned.

Original languageLithuanian
Pages (from-to)67-79
Number of pages13
JournalLimes
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

egalitarianism
tolerance
synergetics
social system
discrimination
minority
discourse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

Tolerancijos ribos ir kulturinis egalitarizmas. / Kanišauskas, Saulius.

In: Limes, Vol. 3, No. 1, 04.2010, p. 67-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7bf2a921d6fe4682b2d854404e12ef0a,
title = "Tolerancijos ribos ir kulturinis egalitarizmas",
abstract = "The significance of formal criteria which could help to sort out the problem of tolerance paradox has emerged in the background of cultural egalitarianism. Alas, such criteria have not been established so far. The conviction that the problem of tolerance is significant just in the context of social and political discourse might be questioned due to the fact that this attitude did not help to tackle this problem throughout the last centuries. The paper aims to show that the problem of tolerance can be solved taking into account systemic attitude and synergetic insights. The current study into the literature on tolerance con- cludes that the formal criterion, which defines the tolerance boundaries in the most general sense, is considered to be such deviations from the standard (as ideal parameters of social system) when tolerance can function normally (sta- bly). Cultural egalitarianism, which requires equalizing the rights of the major- ity and the minorities facing discrimination, impinges on the ratio of necessary diversity, and thus has to be questioned.",
keywords = "Constant of requisite disharmony, Egalitarianism, Tolerance boundaries, Tolerance paradox",
author = "Saulius Kanišauskas",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.3846/limes.2010.07",
language = "Lithuanian",
volume = "3",
pages = "67--79",
journal = "Limes",
issn = "2029-0187",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tolerancijos ribos ir kulturinis egalitarizmas

AU - Kanišauskas, Saulius

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - The significance of formal criteria which could help to sort out the problem of tolerance paradox has emerged in the background of cultural egalitarianism. Alas, such criteria have not been established so far. The conviction that the problem of tolerance is significant just in the context of social and political discourse might be questioned due to the fact that this attitude did not help to tackle this problem throughout the last centuries. The paper aims to show that the problem of tolerance can be solved taking into account systemic attitude and synergetic insights. The current study into the literature on tolerance con- cludes that the formal criterion, which defines the tolerance boundaries in the most general sense, is considered to be such deviations from the standard (as ideal parameters of social system) when tolerance can function normally (sta- bly). Cultural egalitarianism, which requires equalizing the rights of the major- ity and the minorities facing discrimination, impinges on the ratio of necessary diversity, and thus has to be questioned.

AB - The significance of formal criteria which could help to sort out the problem of tolerance paradox has emerged in the background of cultural egalitarianism. Alas, such criteria have not been established so far. The conviction that the problem of tolerance is significant just in the context of social and political discourse might be questioned due to the fact that this attitude did not help to tackle this problem throughout the last centuries. The paper aims to show that the problem of tolerance can be solved taking into account systemic attitude and synergetic insights. The current study into the literature on tolerance con- cludes that the formal criterion, which defines the tolerance boundaries in the most general sense, is considered to be such deviations from the standard (as ideal parameters of social system) when tolerance can function normally (sta- bly). Cultural egalitarianism, which requires equalizing the rights of the major- ity and the minorities facing discrimination, impinges on the ratio of necessary diversity, and thus has to be questioned.

KW - Constant of requisite disharmony

KW - Egalitarianism

KW - Tolerance boundaries

KW - Tolerance paradox

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953165693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953165693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3846/limes.2010.07

DO - 10.3846/limes.2010.07

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 67

EP - 79

JO - Limes

JF - Limes

SN - 2029-0187

IS - 1

ER -