Unification of judicial practice concerning parental responsibility in the european union-challenges applying regulation brussels II bis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The article briefly describes international legislation in parental responsibility matters and focuses on the Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (in practice called Brussels II a or Brussels II bis). The essay reveals and analyses the difficulties which occur while hearing parental responsibility cases within the European Union. Particular attention is given to special cases which were difficult to resolve for the national courts of the Republic of Lithuania. Also, the practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union is examined. The guidelines on how to avoid the problems of establishing jurisdiction are given. The relations of 1980 Hague Convention on international child abduction and Regulations Brussels II bis are revealed and the reasons for adoption of the Regulation are highlighted. The article also proposes improvements for Article 15 of the Regulation and the effective application of a modified forum non conveniens doctrine in parental responsibility cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-127
Number of pages15
JournalBaltic Journal of Law and Politics
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2014

Fingerprint

regulation
responsibility
European Community
jurisdiction
abduction
court of justice
Lithuania
doctrine
republic
legislation

Keywords

  • 1980 Hague Convention on international child abduction
  • Brussels II a
  • Brussels II bis
  • Child abduction
  • Jurisdiction
  • Parental responsibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{2647e64517e04e24a7bd039163b58b4f,
title = "Unification of judicial practice concerning parental responsibility in the european union-challenges applying regulation brussels II bis",
abstract = "The article briefly describes international legislation in parental responsibility matters and focuses on the Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (in practice called Brussels II a or Brussels II bis). The essay reveals and analyses the difficulties which occur while hearing parental responsibility cases within the European Union. Particular attention is given to special cases which were difficult to resolve for the national courts of the Republic of Lithuania. Also, the practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union is examined. The guidelines on how to avoid the problems of establishing jurisdiction are given. The relations of 1980 Hague Convention on international child abduction and Regulations Brussels II bis are revealed and the reasons for adoption of the Regulation are highlighted. The article also proposes improvements for Article 15 of the Regulation and the effective application of a modified forum non conveniens doctrine in parental responsibility cases.",
keywords = "1980 Hague Convention on international child abduction, Brussels II a, Brussels II bis, Child abduction, Jurisdiction, Parental responsibility",
author = "Kristina Pranevičiene",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2478/bjlp-2014-0007",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "113--127",
journal = "Baltic Journal of Law and Politics",
issn = "2029-0454",
publisher = "Versita (Central European Science Publishers)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unification of judicial practice concerning parental responsibility in the european union-challenges applying regulation brussels II bis

AU - Pranevičiene, Kristina

PY - 2014/6/1

Y1 - 2014/6/1

N2 - The article briefly describes international legislation in parental responsibility matters and focuses on the Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (in practice called Brussels II a or Brussels II bis). The essay reveals and analyses the difficulties which occur while hearing parental responsibility cases within the European Union. Particular attention is given to special cases which were difficult to resolve for the national courts of the Republic of Lithuania. Also, the practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union is examined. The guidelines on how to avoid the problems of establishing jurisdiction are given. The relations of 1980 Hague Convention on international child abduction and Regulations Brussels II bis are revealed and the reasons for adoption of the Regulation are highlighted. The article also proposes improvements for Article 15 of the Regulation and the effective application of a modified forum non conveniens doctrine in parental responsibility cases.

AB - The article briefly describes international legislation in parental responsibility matters and focuses on the Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (in practice called Brussels II a or Brussels II bis). The essay reveals and analyses the difficulties which occur while hearing parental responsibility cases within the European Union. Particular attention is given to special cases which were difficult to resolve for the national courts of the Republic of Lithuania. Also, the practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union is examined. The guidelines on how to avoid the problems of establishing jurisdiction are given. The relations of 1980 Hague Convention on international child abduction and Regulations Brussels II bis are revealed and the reasons for adoption of the Regulation are highlighted. The article also proposes improvements for Article 15 of the Regulation and the effective application of a modified forum non conveniens doctrine in parental responsibility cases.

KW - 1980 Hague Convention on international child abduction

KW - Brussels II a

KW - Brussels II bis

KW - Child abduction

KW - Jurisdiction

KW - Parental responsibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925349071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925349071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2478/bjlp-2014-0007

DO - 10.2478/bjlp-2014-0007

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 113

EP - 127

JO - Baltic Journal of Law and Politics

JF - Baltic Journal of Law and Politics

SN - 2029-0454

IS - 1

ER -