VAT fraud prevention in EU

Gediminas Valantiejus, Gintarė Giriūnienė, Gintaras Černius, Liucija Birškytė, E.C.J.M. (Lisette) van der Hel- van Dijk RA, Liudas Jurkonis, Mantas Mališauskas, Milda Olencevičiūtė, Gintarė Grambaitė

Research output: Book/ReportBook

60 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Over time, the illegal VAT refund from the budget has started to attract the attention of tax administrators, thus becoming quite a risky way of making money. However, there was a surge of popularity in less risky VAT avoidance schemes that are based on the misuse of the right to deduct VAT. The contents of frequent indictments and court verdicts show that, when qualifying one or another VAT tax fraud scheme as fraudulent activity, there is confusion on which specific fraud feature meets the contents of such a scheme. Meanwhile, such inaccuracies can determine the complete failure of the court case or significantly lengthen the process. In addition to the most important aspects, according to the specifics of the case, it may be necessary to justify other nuances that are significant for proper classification of offences, for example, that the fraudulent activity was completed or stopped in the preparation/ attempt stage; that there was participation of accomplices and which circumstances show that one or another accomplice realized his involvement in a VAT fraud scheme; that all episodes are evaluated as one continuous fraud or vice versa – as several separate frauds. Due to the fact that several institutions are often involved in different stages of the fraud research, it is difficult to properly collect all the evidence. Due to the fact that VAT fraud cases often end quite favourably for VAT embezzlers, the number of VAT frauds, as shown by research, is not decreasing.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationVilnius, Lithuania
PublisherMykolas Romeris University
Commissioning bodyEuropean Comission’s HERCULE III Programme under Grant Agreement OLAF/2016/D1/017
Number of pages91
Volume-
Edition-
ISBN (Electronic)978-9955-19-847-5
Publication statusPublished - Dec 27 2016

Fingerprint

fraud
EU
accomplice
tax fraud
taxes
popularity
budget
money
offense
participation
evidence

Keywords

  • VAT tax fraud; illegal VAT refund; import VAT; VAT embezzlers; tax administration; VAT audit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Valantiejus, G., Giriūnienė, G., Černius, G., Birškytė, L., van der Hel- van Dijk RA, E. C. J. M. L., Jurkonis, L., ... Grambaitė, G. (2016). VAT fraud prevention in EU. (- ed.) Vilnius, Lithuania: Mykolas Romeris University.

VAT fraud prevention in EU. / Valantiejus, Gediminas; Giriūnienė, Gintarė ; Černius, Gintaras; Birškytė, Liucija; van der Hel- van Dijk RA, E.C.J.M. (Lisette); Jurkonis, Liudas; Mališauskas, Mantas; Olencevičiūtė, Milda; Grambaitė, Gintarė.

- ed. Vilnius, Lithuania : Mykolas Romeris University, 2016. 91 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Valantiejus, G, Giriūnienė, G, Černius, G, Birškytė, L, van der Hel- van Dijk RA, ECJML, Jurkonis, L, Mališauskas, M, Olencevičiūtė, M & Grambaitė, G 2016, VAT fraud prevention in EU. vol. -, - edn, Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Valantiejus G, Giriūnienė G, Černius G, Birškytė L, van der Hel- van Dijk RA ECJML, Jurkonis L et al. VAT fraud prevention in EU. - ed. Vilnius, Lithuania: Mykolas Romeris University, 2016. 91 p.
Valantiejus, Gediminas ; Giriūnienė, Gintarė ; Černius, Gintaras ; Birškytė, Liucija ; van der Hel- van Dijk RA, E.C.J.M. (Lisette) ; Jurkonis, Liudas ; Mališauskas, Mantas ; Olencevičiūtė, Milda ; Grambaitė, Gintarė. / VAT fraud prevention in EU. - ed. Vilnius, Lithuania : Mykolas Romeris University, 2016. 91 p.
@book{bf268cf3adf6449f94bde0a2796a80c4,
title = "VAT fraud prevention in EU",
abstract = "Over time, the illegal VAT refund from the budget has started to attract the attention of tax administrators, thus becoming quite a risky way of making money. However, there was a surge of popularity in less risky VAT avoidance schemes that are based on the misuse of the right to deduct VAT. The contents of frequent indictments and court verdicts show that, when qualifying one or another VAT tax fraud scheme as fraudulent activity, there is confusion on which specific fraud feature meets the contents of such a scheme. Meanwhile, such inaccuracies can determine the complete failure of the court case or significantly lengthen the process. In addition to the most important aspects, according to the specifics of the case, it may be necessary to justify other nuances that are significant for proper classification of offences, for example, that the fraudulent activity was completed or stopped in the preparation/ attempt stage; that there was participation of accomplices and which circumstances show that one or another accomplice realized his involvement in a VAT fraud scheme; that all episodes are evaluated as one continuous fraud or vice versa – as several separate frauds. Due to the fact that several institutions are often involved in different stages of the fraud research, it is difficult to properly collect all the evidence. Due to the fact that VAT fraud cases often end quite favourably for VAT embezzlers, the number of VAT frauds, as shown by research, is not decreasing.",
keywords = "VAT tax fraud; illegal VAT refund; import VAT; VAT embezzlers; tax administration; VAT audit",
author = "Gediminas Valantiejus and Gintarė Giriūnienė and Gintaras Černius and Liucija Birškytė and {van der Hel- van Dijk RA}, {E.C.J.M. (Lisette)} and Liudas Jurkonis and Mantas Mališauskas and Milda Olencevičiūtė and Gintarė Grambaitė",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "27",
language = "English",
volume = "-",
publisher = "Mykolas Romeris University",
edition = "-",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - VAT fraud prevention in EU

AU - Valantiejus, Gediminas

AU - Giriūnienė, Gintarė

AU - Černius, Gintaras

AU - Birškytė, Liucija

AU - van der Hel- van Dijk RA, E.C.J.M. (Lisette)

AU - Jurkonis, Liudas

AU - Mališauskas, Mantas

AU - Olencevičiūtė, Milda

AU - Grambaitė, Gintarė

PY - 2016/12/27

Y1 - 2016/12/27

N2 - Over time, the illegal VAT refund from the budget has started to attract the attention of tax administrators, thus becoming quite a risky way of making money. However, there was a surge of popularity in less risky VAT avoidance schemes that are based on the misuse of the right to deduct VAT. The contents of frequent indictments and court verdicts show that, when qualifying one or another VAT tax fraud scheme as fraudulent activity, there is confusion on which specific fraud feature meets the contents of such a scheme. Meanwhile, such inaccuracies can determine the complete failure of the court case or significantly lengthen the process. In addition to the most important aspects, according to the specifics of the case, it may be necessary to justify other nuances that are significant for proper classification of offences, for example, that the fraudulent activity was completed or stopped in the preparation/ attempt stage; that there was participation of accomplices and which circumstances show that one or another accomplice realized his involvement in a VAT fraud scheme; that all episodes are evaluated as one continuous fraud or vice versa – as several separate frauds. Due to the fact that several institutions are often involved in different stages of the fraud research, it is difficult to properly collect all the evidence. Due to the fact that VAT fraud cases often end quite favourably for VAT embezzlers, the number of VAT frauds, as shown by research, is not decreasing.

AB - Over time, the illegal VAT refund from the budget has started to attract the attention of tax administrators, thus becoming quite a risky way of making money. However, there was a surge of popularity in less risky VAT avoidance schemes that are based on the misuse of the right to deduct VAT. The contents of frequent indictments and court verdicts show that, when qualifying one or another VAT tax fraud scheme as fraudulent activity, there is confusion on which specific fraud feature meets the contents of such a scheme. Meanwhile, such inaccuracies can determine the complete failure of the court case or significantly lengthen the process. In addition to the most important aspects, according to the specifics of the case, it may be necessary to justify other nuances that are significant for proper classification of offences, for example, that the fraudulent activity was completed or stopped in the preparation/ attempt stage; that there was participation of accomplices and which circumstances show that one or another accomplice realized his involvement in a VAT fraud scheme; that all episodes are evaluated as one continuous fraud or vice versa – as several separate frauds. Due to the fact that several institutions are often involved in different stages of the fraud research, it is difficult to properly collect all the evidence. Due to the fact that VAT fraud cases often end quite favourably for VAT embezzlers, the number of VAT frauds, as shown by research, is not decreasing.

KW - VAT tax fraud; illegal VAT refund; import VAT; VAT embezzlers; tax administration; VAT audit

M3 - Book

VL - -

BT - VAT fraud prevention in EU

PB - Mykolas Romeris University

CY - Vilnius, Lithuania

ER -