What policy actors seek for

Reciprocal misunderstanding of objectives of participatory decision making

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The goal of this research is to explore different policy actors’ attitudes towards participation in public decision making. The paper examines objectives of external participants’ involvement and compares various participants’ judgements on the process and results of participation. We screened operation of formal networks of participatory decision making at the Lithuanian Ministries of Health and Education & Science. The research revealed the willingness of decision makers to allow different stakeholders to contribute to the solution of problems of diverse character. The results of interviews manifested reciprocal miscommunication towards objectives and results of participatory decision making. Public administrators demonstrated their high willingness to acquire expertise, while external participants sought to present specific interests and got them implemented as well. However, it has to be admitted that decision makers are not committed to the results generated by stakeholders.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
JournalEuropean journal of interdisciplinary studies
Volume5
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

decision making
decision maker
stakeholder
participation
ministry
expertise
interview
science
health
education

Keywords

  • Interest representation
  • Stakeholders
  • Participatory framework

Cite this

@article{a15462dce6a141bf900088975a7150a1,
title = "What policy actors seek for: Reciprocal misunderstanding of objectives of participatory decision making",
abstract = "The goal of this research is to explore different policy actors’ attitudes towards participation in public decision making. The paper examines objectives of external participants’ involvement and compares various participants’ judgements on the process and results of participation. We screened operation of formal networks of participatory decision making at the Lithuanian Ministries of Health and Education & Science. The research revealed the willingness of decision makers to allow different stakeholders to contribute to the solution of problems of diverse character. The results of interviews manifested reciprocal miscommunication towards objectives and results of participatory decision making. Public administrators demonstrated their high willingness to acquire expertise, while external participants sought to present specific interests and got them implemented as well. However, it has to be admitted that decision makers are not committed to the results generated by stakeholders.",
keywords = "Interest representation, Stakeholders, Participatory framework",
author = "Birutė Pitrėnaitė-Žilėnienė and Birutė Mikulskienė",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "European journal of interdisciplinary studies",
issn = "2067-3795",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What policy actors seek for

T2 - Reciprocal misunderstanding of objectives of participatory decision making

AU - Pitrėnaitė-Žilėnienė, Birutė

AU - Mikulskienė, Birutė

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The goal of this research is to explore different policy actors’ attitudes towards participation in public decision making. The paper examines objectives of external participants’ involvement and compares various participants’ judgements on the process and results of participation. We screened operation of formal networks of participatory decision making at the Lithuanian Ministries of Health and Education & Science. The research revealed the willingness of decision makers to allow different stakeholders to contribute to the solution of problems of diverse character. The results of interviews manifested reciprocal miscommunication towards objectives and results of participatory decision making. Public administrators demonstrated their high willingness to acquire expertise, while external participants sought to present specific interests and got them implemented as well. However, it has to be admitted that decision makers are not committed to the results generated by stakeholders.

AB - The goal of this research is to explore different policy actors’ attitudes towards participation in public decision making. The paper examines objectives of external participants’ involvement and compares various participants’ judgements on the process and results of participation. We screened operation of formal networks of participatory decision making at the Lithuanian Ministries of Health and Education & Science. The research revealed the willingness of decision makers to allow different stakeholders to contribute to the solution of problems of diverse character. The results of interviews manifested reciprocal miscommunication towards objectives and results of participatory decision making. Public administrators demonstrated their high willingness to acquire expertise, while external participants sought to present specific interests and got them implemented as well. However, it has to be admitted that decision makers are not committed to the results generated by stakeholders.

KW - Interest representation

KW - Stakeholders

KW - Participatory framework

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - European journal of interdisciplinary studies

JF - European journal of interdisciplinary studies

SN - 2067-3795

IS - 2

ER -